How this beat this formation... pirctures

Him:

http://i.imgur.com/8OSIADb.png

Me:

http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/4927/yn66.png

Please advise..

waw that is smart formation ..
not sure what to answer to that ?
i never played against it
but if i had something to pick , i may go with 3-3W-2-1-1, attacking in mid mix passing (of short), red arrow on 2 sides players, and 4 blues for CBs and DMC
3-3W-2-2 with long balls could be an answer too ..
but again am not sure man .. i never played against it

3w-3n-2n-2w-1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dv8r

3w-3n-2n-2w-1

---

what if he was attacking through flanks too and had red arrows on LM/RM .. i just feel it will be too risky .. imo, adding 3W DMC/DML/DMR work better, bcz it keep flanks safe and still double mark the 2 AMC by 3W , why putting 3 DMCs, when each AMC will be marked by the DMC, one of DMR or DML, 2 CM, and 3 CBs, a total of 7 are marking each

3N-1-4-2 might work. But i never against it, tbh.

I dont see reason how 3N-1-4-2 might work against it,cuz he has wings and he easily score.
4-1-4-1 might work,you'll stop his attack and you'll gain ball possession with strong midfield.
Butterfly will work fine too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sdw

I dont see reason how 3N-1-4-2 might work against it,cuz he has wings and he easily score.
4-1-4-1 might work,you'll stop his attack and you'll gain ball possession with strong midfield.
Butterfly will work fine too.

---

Yep he has ML/MR. But i bellieve his focus is through the middle. And also use zonal marking, so ur dmc can go to right and left. Or if you worries with his winger, use 4-1-3N-2. :) Another choice is Maple leaf with 2striker, with defensive mentality with long passing and man on man marking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dv8r

3w-3n-2n-2w-1

---

Think his mean 3W-2N-2N-2W-1,

----------ST----------
-AML------------AMR-
------MC----MC-------
-----DMC---DMC------
-DL------DC-----DR-

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by _hAsya_

3N-1-4-2 might work. But i never against it, tbh.

---

I prefer to use 3W-1-4-2.

Check dis pic,
http://imageshack.us/a/img841/4315/imeg8.png

Level 9 Vs. Level 1. And the match ends with 2-0, i think 3W-1-4-2 should do ok with same avg qty :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fadhul17

I prefer to use 3W-1-4-2.

Check dis pic,
http://imageshack.us/a/img841/4315/imeg8.png

Level 9 Vs. Level 1. And the match ends with 2-0, i think 3W-1-4-2 should do ok with same avg qty :)

---

I thought about 4-1-3W-2. It might work. No chance i'll play with 3W on the defense..to easy to break.

By the way. Thought about this as well. Maybe it'll work?

http://i.imgur.com/fge2U4T.png

Regular, Whole Pitch, Through the middle, hard tackling, mixed passing and man on man.
Y/N? What do you guys reccomend?
I think 4-1-3w-2 will work the best.