Quote Originally Posted by Brian Dang View Post
Click image for larger version.  Name: 1964885_283630358461802_1431567324_n.jpg  Views: 1312  Size: 41.4 KB  ID: 20411
Click image for larger version.  Name: 1979561_283631101795061_101397120_n.jpg  Views: 1233  Size: 45.7 KB  ID: 20410
Click image for larger version.  Name: 1622828_283631048461733_135861758_n.jpg  Views: 1336  Size: 48.6 KB  ID: 20412
Click image for larger version.  Name: 1891041_283630951795076_624397899_n.jpg  Views: 1232  Size: 62.2 KB  ID: 20413
Click image for larger version.  Name: 1896781_283630835128421_765335178_n.jpg  Views: 1228  Size: 46.8 KB  ID: 20414
the difference between your team and my suggestion are the 3n vs 3w. Basically i suggested 4-1-3n-1-1 u 4-1-3w-1.....i suggested 3n cause i am a firm believer in going narrow if the opponent plays wide. In 4-1-3n-1-1 vs 4-3w-1-2 every player of the opponent is marked and double marked while also having more mids to control the game in the middle of the park. Plus u have the am roaming freely around to create havoc.