Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Anyone a solution to 4-4-2?

  1. #1
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    52

    Anyone a solution to 4-4-2?

    So we have Played a few games now. Does anyone has a solution allready for the overpowered 4-4-2. The only counter formation i use is 4-4-2. With the other formations i lose. I allready have tried the 4-5-1 flat with arrows. Not working.

  2. #2
    Apprentice Smoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Smoggieland
    Posts
    289
    4-1-2-1-2

  3. #3
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by Smoggie View Post
    4-1-2-1-2
    I see at my competition People losing with Narrow Diamond vs 4-4-2

  4. #4
    Apprentice Smoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Smoggieland
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Dennie Söderland View Post
    I see at my competition People losing with Narrow Diamond vs 4-4-2
    Well i've seen them win .

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    11
    Tryd loads of counters to 4-4-2 this season and lost them or drawed them all against weakers teams. Im just gonna use 4-4-2 myself when im up against someone playing that formation.

    Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9300 met Tapatalk
    Cat Harrison likes this.

  6. #6
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by Smoggie View Post
    Well i've seen them win .
    I have seen People win from 4-4-2 aswell but it always has to do with red cards or injuries.

    I have never seen a formation win normal from 4-4-2.

    Even if i have 10 points more do win... Till i switch to 4-4-2 and the i win 3-1/ 4-1

  7. #7
    Famous Morgan O'Bree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,622
    with a same Q opponent i used 3-1-4-2, 3-5-2 V and ND and all three gave me 60% possession and pressure over them.

  8. #8
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
    with a same Q opponent i used 3-1-4-2, 3-5-2 V and ND and all three gave me 60% possession and pressure over them.
    Is this before or after the new game engine? Before the New game engine i won the most vs 4-4-2, but now i can have more Ball possession but still losing the match

  9. #9
    Addicted Chris Rath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    735
    Quote Originally Posted by Dennie Söderland View Post
    I see at my competition People losing with Narrow Diamond vs 4-4-2
    The outcome depends on how the 4-4-2 is motivated. If have noticed that formations with 5 midfielders can do quite well.
    There was another thread where a forum user explained the setup for 4-5-1 flat with offensive arrows on wing and defensive on central midfielders. In the cup I noticed a 5-0 victory for a 3W-5-2 against 4-4-2 (both similar quality), but I did not watch it live, so I can not state anything about support, tactical changed (but no substitutions or cards were displayed in the match report).



    Founded: January, 16th 2013
    League level: 20
    "We are no cup team, we are a pub team"

    - FCK stories from time to time, when I look around. -

  10. #10
    Rookie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    70
    442 strikes again 50 v 40 cl match, home with 13% 3n 2w 3 2 lost 2-1 , used everyting no joy might but a right winger haha

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast