Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Whats the best way to beat 3 2W 2 1 2

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    48

    Question Whats the best way to beat 3 2W 2 1 2

    Hi folks,

    I always seem to run into different opinions on how to beat this formation and it makes it difficult for me to decide on the best approach.

    ----st-----st------
    ------amc--------
    ---mc-----mc----
    dml----------dmr
    ---dc--dc--dc----

    I have heard people say go down the middle and others say go down the flanks. What is the best approach?

    I beat this guy (formation above) by the skin of my teeth last time 1-0 with a 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond, normal mentality, down the middle,own half, normal tackling, short passing, zonal.

    What if I tried this:

    -------st----------
    ------amc--------
    ---mc-----mc----
    dml---dmc---dmr
    ---dc--dc--dc----

    I would be really be grateful if anyone could tell me of a better approach and their experiences.

    Thanks,

    Shak

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    48
    I am people have no views on this? Seems to be a topic with many opinions.

  3. #3
    Rookie Mohamed Sultan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    148
    Use 2 AMCs and go through middle. Use 3-1-3W-2-1. Your two ML and MR will cancel his two wing backs. Your DMC will cancel his AMC. You will have three DCs against his two STs. Both of your AMCs will be free to attack.

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    48
    Have you had much success with that and what orders would you give?

  5. #5
    Rookie Mohamed Sultan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    148
    http://forum.topeleven.com/formation...-season-4.html

    Take a look at my post at the end of the page.

    It will also depend on the quality difference between your team and the opponent.
    Last edited by Mohamed Sultan; 09-12-2013 at 02:39 AM.

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    48
    I am confused isnt that not against 4 4 2 than a 3 2W 2 1 2.
    Last edited by theshak06; 09-13-2013 at 02:47 PM.