any nice formation for the team???
:/:(
Printable View
any nice formation for the team???
:/:(
For what? This doesn't help us in any way.
-------ST-------
-AML-AMC-AMR
----MC--MC----
------DMC------
-DC---DC---DC-
This formation kicks ass!!!!! ;)
:rolleyes:
Not much wide defensive cover there Craciot. I imagine if 2 teams played that formation against each other, it would be a high-scoring game
I just played against it in the CL. let's say my AML and AMR had a nice evening out.Quote:
Originally Posted by leefisher
I'm playing against the following formation tomorrow:
---------ST--------
-------------------
--MC--MC--MC--MR
--------DMC-------
DL---DC---DC---DR
---------GK-------
It's a 1st vs 2nd game. Do you think your formation above will still kick ass? I might try it
Using DC-DC-DC against ML/MR or AML/AMR is just suicide. No wing defence = Get ownedQuote:
Originally Posted by leefisher
That's what I was thinking dv8r. I will need at least a LB. Maybe I could try Craciots formation with an LB in my back 3Quote:
Originally Posted by dv8r
Try craciot's formation with DL and DR.Quote:
Originally Posted by leefisher
That would still be a 3 man defence consisting of DL-DC-DR. The DC and DMC will mark his striker and the DL and DR will take care of his ML and MR
Please note he doesn't have a left midfielder, just 3 central and a right midfielder. So is there any point in playing a right back. I can give my right back a day off, and have 2 central defenders with my left back
what orders/instructions would you give with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by cracicot
Ah yes, I didn't see that. You could go for that tooQuote:
Originally Posted by leefisher
My next matchup...really strange formation:
Attachment 13410
Any advice?
Illegal formation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mischa Cali
Isn't there a Formations & Tactics section of the forum? I think I've forgotten, Correct me if I'm wrong!
That illegal formation still wins games...Quote:
Originally Posted by dv8r
I did try there...http://forum.topeleven.com/formation...-corner-6.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
so...any useful advice besides telling me where to post and that its an illegal formation?
:mad::mad:;):D:p
top eleven .com
So now i tried 3 different threads to get a useful answer...but no...i only get told that i post in the wrong thread...great job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mischa Cali
I've been moving/redirecting these threads as I find them to the Form.&Tactix . They sprout up everywhere.... and it would be great if people could find the answers to questions easily... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
I would go 4 4 2 and not worry too hard Mischa, but check they aren't playing you and switch it up to something legal before match time.
Cheers Cat
Its just that he's using illegal formation and still wins games with it. Really dont understand and this is a reason to get mad cause its yet another uncalculable Factor in this game. Does it now matter or not? I really start getting confused.
In my logic...when something is called illegal its gets penalized. So an illegal formation, again in my logic, should be an automatic loss...no matter against what q team.
But i guess there are only rumours going around as its with all since nordeus refuses to deliver valuable information...in fact they don't deliver anything valuable.....and it really pisses me off.
Well, illegal formation is just a term used for modules that result in severe possession loss. It doesn't mean they can't win, just that the odds are less in their favor. It is pretty ick to be the team they lose to, I grant you. Don't have hard tackling on, don't play too aggressive. This can concede PK...goal, corner...goal. I'd have mentality defensive, really, they are sitting in your end. No counter attack.
Good Luck! Let me know what result
I was thinking of a 4-1-4-1 or even a 4-2-3w-1 to counter his AMC and 3 strikers
but i guess because its an illegal formation and he loses possession i'd still have too much pos on my side to counter attack effectively?
So if i go 4-4-2 i should be around 80% possession since i have the better midfielders. But whats with his massive attacking force?
Insanity?? Who knows, that's why I wonder if he will change it before.
Zonal, with maybe blue arrows on your D (though not sure about the arrows but maybe it keeps them from getting ideas about wandering..)
Can't do a proper 4-4-2 cause i'm missing DL due to injury and red card.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cat Harrison
So either i go for asymetrical (DC-DC-DC-DR) or 3dc 1dmc. What to do?^^
I like symmetry but it seems your opp. doesn't, so I'd be tempted to go with the D's & DR.
Cheers will give you and update on how it worked out. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cat Harrison
