Hi! To start I want to apologize, because I'm no good English (I'm Spanish) Well, my formation is 4-1-2-2-1 aml and amr up:
gk
dl dc dc dr
dmc
mc mc
aml amr
st
Do you like this formation?
Thanks!!
Printable View
Hi! To start I want to apologize, because I'm no good English (I'm Spanish) Well, my formation is 4-1-2-2-1 aml and amr up:
gk
dl dc dc dr
dmc
mc mc
aml amr
st
Do you like this formation?
Thanks!!
Well, Your tactic is not bad..I always changing my tactics when I see the opponent.....
I'm gonna say it's a fantastic formation .... just cause it's the one I start with a lot of the time :D
But if you're watching the match don't be afraid to change it if things aren't going well. I mostly swap the dmc for another st just after half time to give more attacking options when the opponents defense is starting to tire.
Works for me .... most of the time .. ish ... well sometimes ... depends on who you're playing .... good luck :)
Ok thank you!!! and which is the best formation among all? thanks: D
4-5-1 v styleQuote:
Originally Posted by Mario Rionda Álvarez
----------ST----------
-AML-------------AMR-
------MC----MC------
---------DMC---------
-DL---DC----DC---DR-
----------GK---------
Team Mentality : Normal
Focus passing : 2 flanks
Pressing style : own half
Tackling : normal
Passing : mixed
Marking : Zonal
Counter attk : ON
Offside : Off
but, this formation is not effectif vs 3 MC and WC
Ok thanks and which is better: to rise only aml and amr or falls dr, dc, dl and up the rest (dmc, mc, aml, amr and st) thanks.
I think the rise just DMC and (AML, AMR)->because they are the focus of attack) and the falls is all defender ( DL-DC-DC-DR ).Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Rionda Álvarez
ST normal