Printable View
Hey, I have tried this formation several times today against various formations. It is the formation I believe that was suggested by a formal member.Attachment 19586Attachment 19587Attachment 19589Attachment 19588Attachment 19590 All these matches were played against almost equal and active Managers, good friends of mine:)
Can't tell but I'm curious about it, might try it when I get another ST looks interesting. :3 Thanks for sharing!
Well, I guess you could also play it with an AML and AMR with arrows up instead of 3 ST's. I will try that as w
well and post results. It just looks way to spotty in the
Defense but with the orders it seems like you do not need a defense? I will try it a few more times and see what happens:)
Nice, that would be really helpful. Thanks in advance.
How tactical adjustments brothers ?
what about quality of your opponets ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco Brown
did you try in competitions?
I do not think have any luck against the tactics played by the center like
4-1-2-1-2 diamond
4-3n-1-2
4-1-3n-2
even against
4-5-1vstyle
4-3n-3
4-3n-2w-1
Can you please try with:
3n-3wdm- 4mc-1 => red arrow on ml & mr
or
3n-1-5-1 => red arrow on ml & mr
or
3n-1-3n-2wam-1 => if both aml/r can play as ST then red arrow on them
Tactics of 3313 PLZ
