Printable View
tomorrow I'll face my last match on league this season, i have to keep my first position on the league table
my rival has used 5-3-2 formation, is it possible to defeat him with my current formation...?? I use 4-2-3-1
his team
Attachment 1838
my team
Attachment 1839
4-4-2 classic
3-4-1-2 formation...
3 DC, ML-MC-MC-MR, AMC, 2 ST
Looks like he has taken the defensive option... Go with attacking mentality, pressing full pitch with offside trap, down both flanks, mixed passing, zonal marking, normal tackling and no counter. No arrows.
He's got so many players out of position so you should beat him easily.
do u mean like this...??
Attachment 1840
and how about 4-4-2 classic orders....??
Yep, you should beat him because he has midfielder as goalkeeper and midfielders in defence... He will get a lot of yellow cards so you should have a good free kick taker so you can gain advantage, put Pereira on free kicksQuote:
Originally Posted by Michael Unonk
yeah, I will...
but anyway how about Fasteridis a freekick taker...?? or a corner kick taker...?? lol
here is the result...
thank you all and I'll get my second trphy league....
Attachment 1883
just beat one using this formation .. had 66% of possession and he was watching the match too
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3573/clqtrs6.jpg
You were lucky, I think you played a bad formation vs 5-3-2.Quote:
Originally Posted by shwanko07
not really... dominated him 68% .. and he was even watching .. so i had no 8% advantage .. and we both are same qualityQuote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
it is simple ... close down all doors he may attack me by filling the gaps .. but letting me having more mid over him to dominate the game and attack his in the central area to isolate his full backs and wingers out of the game.. and it worked like a charm
there is no other way .. i need 2 STs minimum to have a chance of scoring facing his 5 at the back ... and is stupid to attack him at the flanks when he has 2 at each side .. it is only simple logical option that keep me having 5 at back but still 5 in mid and 2 Sts and avoid his strongest area defensively which are the flanks
I might have pushed a midfielder forward to AMC, or moved a striker back to AMC, otherwise .. too bad we're probably not on the same server. Would be fun to play against you.
actually he did pushed CM and played with non and i get 80% possession as result and he had to put one back again, i think engine punished him for playing with no CM .. and he did bring in an AMC, i replaced one of my CM by a DMC, and kept possession at 68% ..Quote:
Originally Posted by Razz
he kept trying different formations and failed bcz i countered each one he put on the table .. by the way that was the starting formation which he changed just before the match, he normally use different formations, and i countered it in last 4 min before the match
Preferably, using an AMC would have helped more... also no need for 3 MCs. 2 is enough here
his players were scouts upfront with 54 QT while my players are 18 yo who were PT and just reached 50-51 QT.. and couldn't risk putting one AMC upfront , i wanted my CM to track back and help defending too .. and bcz i decided to focus my attack in central axis .. i thought my CMs will join the attack more too .. beside my AMC is not a 6* , and i wanted to play an option that use my best 11 players .. and tbh my CMs helped alot defending many times as last defenderQuote:
Originally Posted by dv8r
problem is he is a tricky guy who change formations just before the match in the last minutes .. so had to start in a more conservative way as i was not sure what he will be putting , he initially put 451 , but i suspected it is a fake one and he did changed it 6 min before the match start, but i refreshed and had only time to make 2 changes before game stop me doing so 3 min before the match
how can i beat this formation 5-3N-2 ..?? match 2 5 hours until match
Hello everyone i have a match today so i want you guys to help me out his formation is
5-3N-2 my FOrmation will be 3N-4-1-2 what about tactics ..? help me out guyss :v
Instead of bumping up old threads (which annoys me), why not look for yourself in the stickied thread on the tactics forum?Quote:
Originally Posted by omid_2381
http://forum.topeleven.com/formation...-what-use.html
how about 5-3N-2 formation ..? which formation can beat that ( 5-3N-2) formation..??Quote:
Originally Posted by dv8r
Are you trolling or are you actually trying to annoy me?Quote:
Originally Posted by omid_2381
THAT IS THE FORMATION THAT CAN BEAT 5-3N-2!!!! YOU EVEN REPLIED TO IT
well i trusted this advice so much and here is my result:
i just got trashed holding 15% possession bonus against an unwatched team.
just think twice using 3-4-1-2 vs 5-3-2
Attachment 41054Attachment 41055
I wonder how this "ancient" thread about formation is in general discussion section and how did you find it :confused:
Formation 4-4-2 /LM and RM up arrow/
Tactic
Attacking
Both flangs
All area
Lighter
Long passes
Personall
> Offsides:
56% ball position 44
16 shots 12
7 shots on target 2
Attachment 49002
Attachment 49013
Formation 3-5-2 /LM and RM up arrow, midle CM and right ST down arrow/
Defensive
Both flangs
All area
Lighter
Long passes
Personall
> Counter attack
51 Ball position 49
18 Shots 15
7 Shots on target 7
Attachment 49121
Attachment 49122
4-2-3-1Quote:
Originally Posted by omid_2381
Well I found this "ancient" thread too and let me add my two cents..
I played against a slightly weaker 5-3n-2 team last week and used 3n-4-1-2 and got punished losing 3-1
I thought to my self maybe I should have went with 4-4-2
Well Today I'm facing a 5-3w-2 (also slightly weaker) team and I'm not going with 4-4-2. Reason? Last night my main rival who has a stronger team than mine lost to this guy while using 4-4-2. If it didn't work for him it won't work for me.
Now I'm not sure what to use. But certainly none of those recommended ones in the counter table.
that orders are working ? i'm afraid as somebody else said that lost with that orders
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv8r
He just google it...then it will come to this threadQuote:
Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
