Printable View
I got 4-4-2 formation with that orders: Normal, Both Flanks, Own Half, Normal, Short and Zonal. No counteratack and no outside.
I got red flags on MR and ML.
I got 67.7 team, and one guy with 67.5 won 2-0 me today with that formation: Gyazo - d70c6692699d175a173cfafba249c153.png
¿What I´m doing wrong?
Part of it will depend on his orders, but I would suggest you use mixed length passing, and attacking mentality. Either that or mixed length passing, defensive mentality and force counter. Maybe hard tackling as well if you aren't getting enough possession. And personally I'd remove your red arrows on MR and ML. I guess other formations might work better, but 4-4-2 is a solid formation if you're not sure.
Ok so Ofensive, Both Flanks, Own Half, Normal, Mixed and Zonal. No counteratack and no outside.
¿This should be OK to win that guy? I need a 2-0 :(
I'm not saying that you will win - I'm saying that if I was playing him that's what I would do.
Ok thank you a lot for all mate :)
¿Anyone support that orders or think that others are better?
Up. I need some help with that, im confused because that guy won me 2-0 :( and i have a match with him in 1 day.
If you're using attacking mentality, I'd recommend whole pitch pressing.
Formation wise, I haven't seen this formation before and it doesn't appear to on the counter formation table i'm looking at. That said their are similar formations, such as 5-1-2-1-1 narrow diamond and 5-3n-2. Those are countered by the 3-5-2 v and 4-4-2 classic respectively.
Personally, if it was me i'd run a 3-5-2 v so you'd have 3 DC to mark one striker and a motivated AMC as well as 1 DMC and 2 MC to account for an unmotivated AMC and 3 MC. Attacking mentality, down the flanks, whole pitch pressing, short passing, zonal, no counter, offsides on). Red arrows on DMC and maybe central DC. Blue arrows on both MC's.
Good luck!!!
Agree with pcmacdaniel! You could also try 3n-1-4-2....
This Guy Attacks Through Middle , 4-4-2 is Very Weak at middle , *He Countered you*
Anyone can show me a image from the tactic that pcmacdaniel says? ¿Is it much better than 4-4-2?
Since when did 3-5-2V have an AMC?Quote:
Originally Posted by pcmacdaniel
He means that the 3 DCs can cover striker and the oppositions AMC, if motivated - and 2MCs and a DMC to cover the oppostions MCs as well as his AMC if not motivated. etcQuote:
Originally Posted by John Naish
That makes perfect sense now I read it again! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffs Mad