But if you have dmc mc and amc then it would be 4-1-2-1-2 not 4-3W-3 in 4-3W-3 you have ml mr mc so 3 midfielders 1 red 2 midfielders not illegal formation...
Printable View
But if you have dmc mc and amc then it would be 4-1-2-1-2 not 4-3W-3 in 4-3W-3 you have ml mr mc so 3 midfielders 1 red 2 midfielders not illegal formation...
ml,mr=/=mcQuote:
Originally Posted by christian christiansen
ML=LEFT MIDFIELDER a formation needs to have 3 midfielders so it is not illegal...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gintaras Račas
http://prntscr.com/3tc21p
Yes, but if a formation has 2 midfielders they MUST be MCs. 4-3W-3 without red carded MC would be left with 2 midfielders that are NOT MCs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian Christiansen
I wasn't saying that - I was saying that if you were playing 4-3W-3 and your MC got sent off you wouldn't have a DMC, a MC or an AMC and so you would have no central midfielders and it would be illegal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian Christiansen
But the ml and mr are also midfielders...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gintaras Račas
But the Ml and mr are also midfielders... I think they are counted in the midfield area. So I think with the ml mr it is not an illegal formation... However I don't play 4-3W-3 so I might be wrongQuote:
Originally Posted by John Naish
Me neither - I may be wrong in thinking that you need someone in the centre other than in your back row.Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian Christiansen
@gintaras So by your opinion Screenshot by Lightshot wide diamond is illegal? It doesnt have MCs
You are so right, it is the best for that. But I hate 4 4 2 though so usually leave my team in this Maple Leaf variant: Attachment 24415Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman2pt
My D line rarely gets a card so I don't (didn't! watch it happen after I said this) worry too much about a ejection for them.
Wiki has nice clear description of requirements to avoid possession penalty: http://wiki.topeleven.com/Squad#Formations
