Results 1 to 10 of 22
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: OK So I've worked out the Yellow Triangle Saga FINALLY!!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,270
    Quote Originally Posted by James Smith View Post
    I think it's more confusing then that to me. Like my ML wont go MC or DML but he'll happily play AML or MR.... I also have 2 AMC's and whilst one is happy to play AMR or AML as well as MC and ST the other doesn't like the wings. So I think it's player dependant to some degree too.
    Maybe I've missed something but you do need to consider all the roles. I'll do a check later when on my PC and can check on other teams and then we can see if we can come up with a consistent list if you like. I'll do first checks on roles and you can confirm or post anomolies (or other way around if you like).

    I'm currently training AMR on AML/AMC and I'm hoping he'll go yellow on ST and ML, MC & MR roles too.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Buffs Mad View Post
    Maybe I've missed something but you do need to consider all the roles. I'll do a check later when on my PC and can check on other teams and then we can see if we can come up with a consistent list if you like. I'll do first checks on roles and you can confirm or post anomolies (or other way around if you like).

    I'm currently training AMR on AML/AMC and I'm hoping he'll go yellow on ST and ML, MC & MR roles too.
    OK so it's not as I thought at all. I didn't realise that the AMC that likes the wings was an AMC/AML, so he also doesn't mind AMR....

    MY theory is as follows:-

    GK = only GK(obviously)
    DL = DL-DC-DML
    DR = DR-DC-DMR
    DC = DL-DC-DR
    DML = DML-DL-ML
    DMR = DMR-DR-MR
    DMC = DMC-DC-MC
    ML = ML-MR-AML
    MR = MR-ML-AMR
    MC = MC-DMC-AMC
    AML = AML-AMR-ML
    AMR = AMR-AML-MR
    AMC = AMC=MC-ST
    ST = ST-AML-AMR

    So each role on the field is able to adapt to two others without being detrimental, of course players with more roles assigned to them will cover combinations of these. As long as a player is playing one of the roles he is comfortable in you wont be penalised.

  3. #3
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,270
    Quote Originally Posted by James Smith View Post
    OK so it's not as I thought at all. I didn't realise that the AMC that likes the wings was an AMC/AML, so he also doesn't mind AMR....

    MY theory is as follows:-

    GK = only GK(obviously)
    DL = DL-DC-DML
    DR = DR-DC-DMR
    DC = DL-DC-DR
    DML = DML-DL-ML
    DMR = DMR-DR-MR
    DMC = DMC-DC-MC
    ML = ML-MR-AML
    MR = MR-ML-AMR
    MC = MC-DMC-AMC
    AML = AML-AMR-ML
    AMR = AMR-AML-MR
    AMC = AMC=MC-ST
    ST = ST-AML-AMR

    So each role on the field is able to adapt to two others without being detrimental, of course players with more roles assigned to them will cover combinations of these. As long as a player is playing one of the roles he is comfortable in you wont be penalised.
    Yeah that looks about right. Good Job.