3-2-2-2-1
-x- -x- ST -x- -x-
AL -x- -x- -x- AR
-x-MC -x- MC -x-
DL -x--x--x- DR
-x-DC DC DC-x-
I was hoping for something a little more informative than "formation x-x-x"
Is there a flaw in the approach I used? Is your suggested formation intrinsically better? Why?