__st__st__
_mc_mc_mc
___dmc____
dl_dc_dc_dr
My team is weaker than his team. (49.2) vs (50,6)
Thank you!
Printable View
__st__st__
_mc_mc_mc
___dmc____
dl_dc_dc_dr
My team is weaker than his team. (49.2) vs (50,6)
Thank you!
4-3n-2w-1Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorge.Bruno
def ,or normal,flanks,mixed,counter,zone
or 3DC-1DMC-3MC-AML-AMR-ST
same orders
U must have 3 dc to against your opponents one dmc to protect your mid , I think he will go for mid attk ; to attk him you must go for down both flank,
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I would go with 4-3-2w-1Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorge.Bruno
Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока
Sorry,
He change the middle ML-MC-MR
How to beat 4-1(DMC)-3(ML-MC-MR)-2ST
__st__st__
_ml_mc_mr
___dmc____
dl_dc_dc_dr
My team is weaker than his team. (49.2) vs (50,6)
Thank you!
My regular formation is 4-5-1 V...i use it against 4-1-3w-2 but it doesnt work always . I would try to take control through the midle...pulling back my wings ...and try to press him highQuote:
Originally Posted by Jorge.Bruno
Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока
I think 432w1 is work , go to both flank as well , anyway may I know the result ?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I lost 1-2, he score 89', so I passed for second place...Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Cheong
Thank you.
JB
And what formation you confront him?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorge.Bruno
Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока
Next time if u no sure how to do try go for well balance formation , 442 or ND always work good with atk and def well
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk