Dear users
Please help me to fight against this formation. I have better team but I was not able to beat this formation last season and now I have same player in league.
He has:
gk
dl-dc-dc-dr
ml-mc-mr
amc
st - st
Printable View
Dear users
Please help me to fight against this formation. I have better team but I was not able to beat this formation last season and now I have same player in league.
He has:
gk
dl-dc-dc-dr
ml-mc-mr
amc
st - st
___st_st__
___amc___
aml___amr
___dmc___
dl_dc_dc_dr
If u are better %then your opponents, maybe u can try atk to middle with Amc , maybe try this first 413w11 , if still no score in half time change to 412w12
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I will go for 4-1-3w-1-1 both flkas I suppose, small, short passes right?
this is nonsens I've tried all options. Even 4-1-4-1, 4-1-3W-2, 4-5-1V and still players 10% lower beat me. Please suggest any formation and orders also.
Today I've lost in cup against this formation 1-2 at home
Wow, is this formation get extra something from game system ...
I played against this 4-3w-1-2 before, using 4-5-1v, have no problem at all, last season on cup I win against a higher lvl manager with equal q team; but today on my league match over 20% low q than me kill my 4-5-1v, although I won (1-2 away) at the end. Right after my opponent first goal game screen blink and shows all my defenders + dmc rating are 5 +/- and mid+wing+st around 6 :O
Drag down my aml n amr, switch to 4-1-4-1 60' but still losing 1-0 then switch to 3-1-5-1, make 2 goals but my AM start to yelling that our def straggling, so last 10' again 4-1-4-1, other manager not attend. It was away for me but I had 14% poss
Or is that counter formation no longer useful, here is another story, one of my t11 friend lost (0-1) against 4-4-2; equal q team n manager, my friend use 4-5-1v then second half ND, still can't make it.
ok I lost
This is nonsens. IOpoonent was 10% lower
I tried 4-1-3w-1-1 after 0:0 in 1st hlaf, I've switched to 4-1-2w-1-2 and nothing.
I think 4-1-3w-1-2 is priviledged now this is not normal
I play today friendly match against 4-3-1-2 and i win 3:0. Enemy was with better team.
I play 3 (DL, DC, DR) - 1 (DMC) - 2(MC, MC) - 3 (AML, AMC, AMR) - 1 (ST)
I'm playing against this baby in a few hours. I'm ~100%, he is 90-100%. I can't say for sure -- he has all his 6* players on a bench atm.
In my previous game against him I used 4-5-1 V. I had an advantage, but the game was very hard. I won 1-0, but not without a tiny drop of luck.
This time I'm going to play 3n-3w-2(mc)-1-1.
Normal mentality;
through the middle;
mixed passing style (i'll probably adjust during the game);
counter-attacks.
Low pressing (high consumes too much energy; it's not the Cup Final);
normal tackling;
zonal marking style (I'd set to man-to-man for a difficult and important game; on this I'm going to conserve energy, at least at the beginning);
offside trap is off.
I could also play 4-5-1 V again. Or 4-4-2 ND (not 4-4-2 flat), but I usually prefer to play with big amount of midfielders, which means 3-4 defenders and almost always 1 striker.
I'll get back to you with the report.
(Hello, Adam, I hope you read this! xD)
Finally I found formation I can use :
4-5-1V style, defensive with counter
I won 8-3
Today i play 3(DL,DC,DR)-1(DMC)-3(MC,MC,MC)-2(AML,AMR) -1(ST) and i win against 4-3-1-2.
I win away 1:6.
My team 104% and enemy was 103%, so i think, this tactic is good against 4-3-1-2.
Report, as promised.
Champions League, he was 98%, I was 103%. Manager didn't come, and his stadium was empty. I've changed my mind and played 3n-1-4-1-1. I very rarely play without two AM* players, so that was kinda experiment.
Attachment 76068
Attachment 76069
On ~20th minute when I saw my % of completed passes is 90%, I switched to Long passes, removed defensive arrows from ML and MR, set focus passes to Mixed and scored right after that. When I scored second goal, I moved one MC do DMC position and removed all attacking arrows (3n-2n-3w-1-1). Opponent managed to score, but so did I. After that I set passes to Short, marking style to man-to-man, and finished the game.
Attachment 76070
I got the feeling, the opponent used man-to-man marking style and, probably, defensive menality. Or maybe I just didn't have enough players in attack. Next time I'll try 3n-1-3w-2n-1.