Printable View
Which formation to use: 4(dc)-1(dmc)-2(mc)-1(amc)-2(st)
4(dc)-3(mc)-1(amc)-2(st)
4(dc)-2(mc)-2(aml)(amr)-2(st)
And what tactics to use
** 2(st) and one player who has 3 positions (amc amr st) has to play**
Because I want to change my formation if someone could help me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In your choice and with my experience I like best the narrow diamond. 4-1-2-1-2.
Offense, through the middle, mixed passes, pressing on.
Thats my opinion.
You should also think about your opponents formation as well or do you just plan on playing one formation all the time ?
Please, do not use 2 strikers, you should rather put one in the midfield in my opinion .....
if your opponent is equal to you, use counter formations (just google it, you will find them eventually)
If you are stronger, it doesnt matter but personally I prefer 4-5-1V (6 times treble with it) for one special reason....
65% of managers use 4-4-2 for some unknown reason (maybe lack of creativity ???) and 4-5-1 V is a killer against it
The percentage might be even higher lol
Good luck and think about these two strikers upfront ..... :)
I prefer to find some good players with good form and play them mostly in one position, i don't like to change my formation, i change playersQuote:
Originally Posted by Bunzo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have 2 very good strikers, i will not bench them, thanks for help maybe i will try that formation one gameQuote:
Originally Posted by Mirrowka
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk