HELP! I have to play in the cup against the opponent who used 4 2 3 1
DL DC DC DC DR
MC MC
AML AMC AMR
ST
This is the table of my team and opponent team
Anyone who ever succeed beat 4 2 3 1, how can i beat on top eleven 4 2 3 1? ......please give me all the information what to do exactly, thanks guys..... And sorry for my bad English : D
4-1DMC-3W(ML-MC-MR)-2 = Mixed passing, Through the middle, hard attacking, own half, zonal marking
Hard attacking with just 2 strikers and no AMs?
Look at THIS !
Attachment 5741
and THIS !
Attachment 5742
red arrow only for ML and MR
hahaha I always use Hard attacking for entire my formation except for 4-1DMC-3N-2, 4-4-2 Narrow Diamond with just attacking :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Narf
Um, aren't you suggesting exactly that formation with Hard attacking? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Der Panzer
Or are you saying that you don't use hard attacking against it?
Edit: Ignore this message, didn't notice that it's 3N instead of 3W. :)
Anyway, if it is through the middle and since the other team doesn't have any DMs, doesn't it make more sense to use 4-1DMC-3W-1-1?
Also, it would probably look a bit clunky, but since my DR can also play as DMR, wouldn't it be better to put him in that position, against the opponent's AML?
Have you seen the table of my team? I do not want to defend myself, I want to attack it!
which form should I use to attack it?
3 5 2V ( DC DC DC DMC MC MC AML AMR ST ST) ?
3 1 2 3 1 (DC DC DC DMC MC MC AML AMC AMR ST) ?
3 1 2 1 3 (DL DC DR DMC MC MC AMC ST ST ST) ?
3 2 2 3 (DC DC DC MC MC AML AMR ST ST ST ) ?
3 4 1 2 (DC DC DC ML MC MC MR AMC ST ST)?
or 3 4 3 ( DC DC DC ML MC MC MR ST ST ST) ?
choose one of these, please
thank's
may go with 4-1-4-1 with def,counter, long, attacks on both flanks and red arrow on wingers and fullbacks(take it out if his wingers are exploiting yours )
Dude, he's got 4 attacking players - 4! You can't handle that with just 3 defenders.Quote:
Originally Posted by ppturano
Not true!Quote:
Originally Posted by Narf
I always played with three defenders against hexagon , and I always won!!!
If it's 3 defenders + DML/DMR - sure you did, otherwise it's due to skill difference and luck.
do not write any inaccuracies, please!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Narf
The counter of Hexagon is 3 4 3 (DC DC DC ML MC MC MR ST ST ST)
I used that, just to follow strictly everything that you've suggested. The only thing I didn't do is to have a DR - used a DMR instead and put a blue arrow on him as well as on all full-backs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Der Panzer
I still think this isn't the optimal tactic to use, especially with red arrows on ML/MR if I'll be passing through the middle, where I don't have an AMC. Anyway, the match just finished and I won 0:2, so thank you. :)
Attachment 5750Quote:
Originally Posted by ppturano
Are you sure about that? :)
And before you go into the skill difference factor - it's 19.0 against 18.8 for the winner respectively. A 0:5 away win isn't a fluke. Don't blindly trust the table of counter-formations, it's isn't 100% accurate. If it was - why didn't you just use 4-4-2 Classic like the table says instead of asking here for help? :)
Haahhaha firstly, I used this formation against 4-2N-3W(AM)-1 just accidently because i didnt open and change my squad from the previous match. And i was suprised when I looked the result that I win 6-1 against team in second position in my league.Quote:
Originally Posted by Narf
Why did I use through the middle for the Mixed/Flank-based formation? It happened accidently too and somehow it works. . :D
But for the through the middle-based formation, I always use Mixed and never use through the middle focus. I got better result than I use from middle both attack and defense.
I dunno how the game engine works. I just observe from my every single match and find which is better to use :D
Btw, congrats dude :)
Twice I won the hexagon, using 3 4 3 and twice its quality was superior to mine
I always played with very offensive mentality, to beat the hexagon you must attach...if you play in defense his attackers destroy you!!!
Now I want to attack 4 2 3 1, and I'm trying to do the right tactics.
view table with my training and its, if I can not find a module to attack.... play like him 4 2 3 1
I want the problem of how to defend themselves both in his head, not in my ;)
This formation works well against most teams and a lot of teams use it without having an active manager behind them, or at least not one that adapts to opponents tactics. I don't think you'll be able to get into his head like you intend to. :)
he is an active manager, participates in all matches and is ranked first in the league : Cool:
but I am ranked first in my league and now he certainly read my score 17 0 0 : D
I do agree with narf. I'll never use 3-4-3 against 4-2-2-2 Hexagon and I regret for more believing that table than my observation formation :(
Attachment 5752
Noticed : I always use hard attacking
Try 4-4-2 :)
I need a form with 3 central defenders, can someone help me? thank's
My favourite with 3 isQuote:
Originally Posted by ppturano
----CB---CB--CB----
DMR------------DML
-------CM--CM------
AMR-------------AML
---------ST----------
thank's Pistolero, but.....
This is the table of my team and opponent team, as you can see, I do not have DMR & DML .....so I can not make the team you suggested
I do not want to defend myself, I want to attack it!
which form should I use to attack it?
3 5 2V ( DC DC DC DMC MC MC AML AMR ST ST) ?
3 1 2 3 1 (DC DC DC DMC MC MC AML AMC AMR ST) ?
3 1 2 1 3 (DL DC DR DMC MC MC AMC ST ST ST) ?
3 2 2 3 (DC DC DC MC MC AML AMR ST ST ST ) ?
3 4 1 2 (DC DC DC ML MC MC MR AMC ST ST)?
or 3 4 3 ( DC DC DC ML MC MC MR ST ST ST) ?
choose one of these, please
Congratulations to all connoisseurs of football, which I was advised to play with 4 defenders and not to attack!
Playing 3 4 1 2 (and second half 3 4 3) with very offensive mentality, I easily won the match, obtaining a landslide victory
