4-3n-1-2

How can i beat this formation?
Its very difficult, i need a win and the last game i won 2:3 with the 4-5-1 V style... but i need a save win without risk :confused:

4-3-3 could be good as well,

If i were you, i keep to use 4-5-1 v style motivated ;)

I think i will try 3-1-3-2-1 stylem without any arrows

———-ST———-
AML————–AMR
—-MC–MC–MC—-
———DMC———
—-DC–DC–DC—–

normal, down the flanks, and with counter attack, mixed passing

my team is 7,8 point better. But i am scared :D

My suggestion : dont use 4-5-1 V style formation.It will not work against 4-3N-1-2.Try butterfly - 3-2-2-2-1
My experience shows everytime I use 4-5-1 against this formation,I loose against weaker opponents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sdw

My suggestion : dont use 4-5-1 V style formation.It will not work against 4-3N-1-2.Try butterfly - 3-2-2-2-1
My experience shows everytime I use 4-5-1 against this formation,I loose against weaker opponents.

---

Are you kidding me? butterfly is so weak on the middle. and 4-3N-1-2 is attack from the middle. It's not make sense mate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fadhul17

Are you kidding me? butterfly is so weak on the middle. and 4-3N-1-2 is attack from the middle. It's not make sense mate

---

Why is weak on the middle,you have two MC's.It's enough when you have DML and DMR with red arrows to attack from the wings.He hasn't any wings.This game has no sense sometimes.There is an another option - 3 DC's,DMC,ML,MC,MC,MR,2 ST.Attack from the flanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sdw

Why is weak on the middle,you have two MC's.It's enough when you have DML and DMR with red arrows to attack from the wings.He hasn't any wings.This game has no sense sometimes.There is an another option - 3 DC's,DMC,ML,MC,MC,MR,2 ST.Attack from the flanks.

---

I mean it's too risky to use butterfly. Yeh, this game is joke

I think 4-3W-3 will counter this formation very well...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pnr8555

I think 4-3W-3 will counter this formation very well...

---

I dont think so.It means with only one MC.This will be disaster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sdw

I dont think so.It means with only one MC.This will be disaster.

---

Last season I won 3-1 over 4-3N-1-2 with 4-3W-3...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pnr8555

Last season I won 3-1 over 4-3N-1-2 with 4-3W-3...

---

nice.Against weaker or stronger opponent.

beat 6th away he was using the same formation today, i countered it with motivated 4141, i win 1-0 with 64% possession, but we both had same amount of shoots , and my team is stronger and he was not watching.. so could had been the wrong choice .. he created lots of chances and had to change to 3-1-5-1 at 2nd half with 2 blue on my CM.. didn't changed alot .. he is lower quality to me but give a headache to all teams in top

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shwanko07

beat 6th away he was using the same formation today, i countered it with motivated 4141, i win 1-0 with 64% possession, but we both had same amount of shoots , and my team is stronger and he was not watching.. so could had been the wrong choice .. he created lots of chances and had to change to 3-1-5-1 at 2nd half with 2 blue on my CM.. didn't changed alot .. he is lower quality to me but give a headache to all teams in top

---

Sorry for the stupid question but what you call motivated?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sdw

Sorry for the stupid question but what you call motivated?

---

red arrow on players at flanks : LB/RB/LM/RM .. i usually add one too for the DMC, but make it blue as his AMC and STs were very good and thus needed more protection , i added blue arrow on CBs too

What you think about this???


———-ST———-
AML————–AMR
—-MC–MC–MC—-
———DMC———
—-DC–DC–DC—–

normal, down the flanks, and with counter attack, mixed passing

nobody tells me his opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nxxx

What you think about this???


———-ST———-
AML————–AMR
—-MC–MC–MC—-
———DMC———
—-DC–DC–DC—–

normal, down the flanks, and with counter attack, mixed passing

nobody tells me his opinion.

---

that is what i played 2nd half.. didn't make any difference to 4141
i still had control but problem he still created chances despite am stronger
but noticed it worked better with more attacking mentality

i played with 3-1-3-2-1 the first half and the result was 2:1... and the second i switched a MC with a second ST
but i had 68% possession and 11:5 shots on target...
at the end he got a red card... but at the last minute he had a counter attack... i was crying.

But the end result was 3:2... i think both formation arent good for this.

tomorrow i have to win vs 4-2(mc)-2(AML AMR)-2(ST)

any ideas? :D

i have now 4-4-2 narrow diamond with counter and trough the middle

ehh i decide to use 4-3N-2W-1.. always i have problems to counter this formation (43N2W1) so i hope he will have problems with me:)

hey! What about 4-3N-3. WIll this work against 4-3N-2-1

Mentality and passes of the 4-3n-3 for win 4-3n-1-2 ?

More thanks

Hello guys!! You can use for shure a team like this ( 4-1-3w-2 ) 4 Defenders, One DMC, ONE Central Midfielder (The best of your team), and two wingers ML/MR, finaly 2 beautiful Strickers:-) and this tactics is very flexible, you can change during the game for a 4-4-2, (removing a DMC for a Midfielder) or for a 4-5-1V formation if yours wingers are ML/AML and MR/AMR (removing a stricker for a midfielder) for a 4-1-4-1 with the same move:-) as you can see during the game you have a formation could can change a lot.

The orders are:

Mentality: Normal (Away) Attacking (At Home)
Passing: By the flancks
Pressure: Own Half
Tackling: Normal
Passing Style: Mix Passing (Away) Normal (At Home)
Marking Stile: Zonal
Force counter (Away) and No counter (At Home)