Search:

When the counter-formations table was assembled, 3n-1-3n-1-2 was still an illegal formation.

Any center attacking (4-3n-3, 4-1-2-1-2 ND, 4-3n-1-2, 3n-2w-2-1-2, 4-1-2n-3) formation should work, since he only has 1 player in the central midfield.

Modified 3-5-2 V-style. 3(DL-DC-DC)-1-2n-2w-2. Only thing modified is the back three so you have someone defending your flank against his MR.

Attacking/down the flanks/whole...

4-1-3n-2

4-5-1 V-style. hard defending/down the flanks/own half/hard/long/zonal - force counters/no offsides

Red arrows on the flanks (DL, DR, AML, AMR) blue arrows on MC's

A modified 4-4-2 could work...

Ideally, i'd play a central attacking formation against this, such as the 4-1-2-1-2 ND or 4-3n-1-2 to exploit that lack of central midfielders.

Based upon your roster personnel though, I'd just...

3n-4-3. Three defenders against 2 strikers, allows for man coverage on both strikers with the third defender acting as a sweeper. 2 MC's (blue arrows) provides defense against his MC's. Then the...

Somewhat! It's based upon the experience on several players on this forum. Several of these players are highly skilled top eleven players with lots of experience. It also serves as a very helpful...

For the second one: 3w-1-4-2 or 3w-5-2 V-style.

4-5-1 V-style might work.

However, before changing formations I've got a few questions? Did you max your win bonus? What was player morale and condition like? What is the form of your players...