Search:

Type: Posts; User: dekatch

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Sticky:
    According to the original post its 5-1(dmc)...

    According to the original post its

    5-1(dmc) -2(n) -2

    It's a 5-3-2 formation

    http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14/11/12/9823ef7dcec3271081cd94905863ad69.jpg


    Edit, can't you guys read?...
  2. Sticky:
    Meh. 3-5-2 or 3-4-3 is a legit formation. But...

    Meh.

    3-5-2 or 3-4-3 is a legit formation. But I always use 3dc (narrow) never felt like that I lost because my team has only 3 Def players.


    Or use 5-3-2 and tag/mark dl and dr with red...
  3. Sticky:
    i have good luck beating 4-4-2 with 3-5-2...

    i have good luck beating 4-4-2 with 3-5-2 (3-1-4-2 // 3-4-1-2 // 3-1-3(w)-1-2 // 3-5-2)

    I usually take the 3-1-4-2. with defensive/normal + counter attack
  4. Sticky:
    4-1-3(n)-2 Mourinho formation. he beats...

    4-1-3(n)-2

    Mourinho formation. he beats everything with it. so why shouldn't you?

    I'd go with 3n-1-3w-1-2
  5. Sticky:
    this whole counter formation thing is a bit...

    this whole counter formation thing is a bit overrated

    mourinho wins every match vs every formation with

    4 - 1(DMC) - 3(N) - 2

    so. this ia proven.

    so add this formation to the table as a...
Results 1 to 5 of 5