
Originally Posted by
Jorge Timóteo
I think it was way too expensive to rejoin, particularly since you knew you were most likely to get pummeled again anyway.
Still, my main gripe with the challenge (and with the way Top Eleven currently works) is that the quality of the opposing teams was based on the quality of your team. This makes no sense whatsoever to me. It completely defeats the purpose of building a strong team, since you will have as much difficulty in the challenge playing as a 150% team as you would with a 50% one.
For instance, I must have been around 110% at the time of the challenge. Team 10 (Berlin) was 159%. I think I rejoined twice but could never get past city 7. But then I remembered a second team I had created years ago to try out a few things and pretty much not touched since. I went back to it and found it was 40% quality. And because the quality of my second team was so low, Team 10 in the challenge was a mere 87%. All I had to do was buy 11 players of around 90% quality (old players, so almost no one else would be bidding for them) and I won the entire challenge on the first try. If I remember correctly, I think I won 4-1 in the final.
Wouldn't it make more sense for teams in the challenge to be the same quality for everyone? Say Team 10 would be 140% quality, for instance. If your team was 80%, you would have a hard time winning the challenge, but that would serve to encourage you to try building a stronger team. And if your team was 130% and you won the challenge with relative ease, then good for you. You would just be reaping the just rewards of working hard to have such a strong team.