HELP: in form player OR the better QT one?

have a key game tomorrow facing 2nd in my league, he bought a scout GK later today and he could buy more ..

for me i have made my plans, now am puzzled who to play as my CM, i have one who is a scout 56 QT and another who is is not but close 54 QT, the scout's form is currently awful: 6-6-6-5-6 while the other one was 7-8-7-7-7
so which one to choose?
is the game take into account player's current form?
you see i know for example that EA FIFA Manager used to take the last 5 matches form in the AI calculation effecting player's performance on the pitch .. so is T11 use the same concept too?

I have the exact same problem as you, except with my keepers.. second leg of the cup against a better team, one of my keepers has had crappy form, the other one decent form, but is slightly less quality than the other. I have elected to go with the one with better form for the next game. I don't really expect to win so why not? Just gonna shove 7 players into his half and hope for the best.

choose the best forme for important matches, improve your scot with friendly match, lol. if your team usually played low quality team and he is the best player in pitch, so play him in important match

so i go with in the form one?

what about statistics? does the scout score or assist? what about the lower quality? also what about yellow cards

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shwanko07

so i go with in the form one?

---

I generally do yes...a players form is very important when it comes to squad selection in my opinion...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tziortz

what about statistics? does the scout score or assist? what about the lower quality? also what about yellow cards

---

the lower Qt score more and have better assist .. but again CM have duties both defensively and attacking wise, so can't really depend on his attacking stats

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jklm_37

I generally do yes...a players form is very important when it comes to squad selection in my opinion...

---

the QS is? dose the game take that into account?

I play all my in form players (obviously it can vary from match to match) and ive had a string of good results from doing so :)...

The game engine has to surely take form into consideration :confused:...

hmm guess I will opt with that then
cheers

I prefer quality.

Look at this one, 2* player (a guy with Thai name) got 9 match rating, he didn't score any goals in that match. Why he can get MOTM?

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.n...21885791_n.jpg

that is not quality then and more a form?

i opted to play my best QT player as he has better moral , and will update you guys how it will go

Well I opted to play my in form keeper. I played highly offensive (away leg of the cup, needed to win by atleast and score 2 goals) and left him with only 3 defenders. Won the game against the higher skilled team 3-1, 8 match rating. I had a game 30 minutes later and played my out of form keeper. The team was of lower quality. He made the first mistake I've seen a goalie make on this game. Managed to botch a clearance, they scored on the following corner. We still won 3-1 but he had a 5/10 rating and he is now on the transfer market.

same for me .. i opted for scout one, as usual got 6 rating, replaced him with less quality in form CM, he get 8 rating
so seem form before quality then .. interesting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shwanko07

so seem form before quality then

---

So it seems :)...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shwanko07

that is not quality then and more a form?

i opted to play my best QT player as he has better moral , and will update you guys how it will go

---

That's my friend, That DC with Thai name seems to have terrible form recently, but he did picked up MOTM...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pnr8555

That's my friend, That DC with Thai name seems to have terrible form recently, but he did picked up MOTM...

---

but his quality is poor .. that case i think is random .. it happens at times .. but we can't base ourself on few cases imo that happens rarely or randomly