Which is the harder and the better marking style man-on-man or zonal ?
Thanks.
Printable View
Which is the harder and the better marking style man-on-man or zonal ?
Thanks.
Man on man's better
not if your opponents attackers are higher quality than your defenders .. check especially speed, strength and agressionQuote:
Originally Posted by liam noker
The whole question is flawed, I saw this earlier and just didn't respond because the OP was PMing me for an answer to a question I already answered on a post he had made
But now others are commenting, and the answers aren't helpful in case anyone else hits this thread (excuse me rds, you had a decent attempt)
The question betrays a lack of understanding about the game. Zonal and MTM are both effective, depending on certain factors
The main one is formation - if you go MTM and you have three defenders, but your opponent has two forwards and 3 AM then your defence will be overwhelmed
Also, quality matters - if your worst defender is 1v1 with your opponent's best attacker, then you'll probably concede goals
I go zonal because, frankly, I'm too lazy to change formation and tactics to counter my opponent, plus I believe in playing to your strengths rather than trying to block your opponent
that's sickQuote:
Originally Posted by liam noker
HomophobeQuote:
Originally Posted by magic3
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimplySimon
Sittng in my workplace... trying to act like im earning my keep. thanks for taking the time to answer comprehensively... you may want to also add a comment about player form, especially if set for hard tackling..ta' ... boss ahoy!
*LOL* ... never been to Thailand?Quote:
Originally Posted by SimplySimon
Yes, a few times. What goes on in Thailand etc and so on...Quote:
Originally Posted by rdsouza
<3 Thai girls <3