Attachment 10101
just absurd :)
morales full
condisions aprox. %70 (all players)
who lost points ? == of course me ;)
Printable View
Attachment 10101
just absurd :)
morales full
condisions aprox. %70 (all players)
who lost points ? == of course me ;)
No, it's just how the game is
If you started the game with 70% condition on your players, that's probably why you drew
I won 3-1 against a 15.5 q 2*. Im a 32q 5* team. I dominated much better teams. Condition is a big fact. I was at 60-70%.
95% is the minimum when i am started a match!
there is no reason to have your players with such low condition on the last day of the season with no other games being played. You have only yourself to blame..
OK, even with 70% the guy should have pwned the home team in most circumstances. playing a 4-5-1 flat away to a 4-4-2 classic is also not a positive thing.
So I have to agree that he could have done more homework and maintenence to get the win, but I dont think that 70% was the main factor in the loss. I have won the 2nd game in back-to-back situations many times and they are always between 70-80% condition for the second game, and this is when I am not available to give green bags in between games.
Pretty sure its still a main factor here. They'd be in the 40% range at the end of the game. And if the other team was full condition, I wouldn't be surprised if he'd lost by a goal.
Again, I have beaten quite a few teams with my players at 70-80% and I am sure many others in this forum have had this same experience and won, so I am absolutely sure that it is not the main factor. I believe tactics and formation are the main factors. the difference in quality should make up for the difference in condition, for the most part.Quote:
Originally Posted by festinator
I'm also sure that quite a few people on these forums have started games with low condition against weaker teams and tied or lost. Its not a certainty that you'll win every game against weaker teams if you start them all with 70% condition. This is one of the times where he got unlucky. So once again, I'm not surprised that the match ended in a draw, and wouldn't be surprised if he lost.
Can not understand why this forum insist on trying to find one factor of 1,000 to why you lose given win match. That game was predeterminated. Tarks could use every trick in the book and it still would not matter. Tarkas was robbed, thats it. it happens all the time to everyone. You cant win them all.
I know the feeling and I know it too well.
Vagablue
The games are not predetermined
wow, want to start this one again? There are aspects of this game that lead one to believe that the games are predetermined. I have thought long and hard about this, and can see a hybrid solution, where the game outcomes are predetermined in the 3-4 minutes before the actual game, but it might be possible to affect the outcome based on if the changes you make during the game are sufficient enough to change to one of the other outcomes that is more in your favour.Quote:
Originally Posted by festinator
It is possible that there are several outcomes of every game that are predetermined and depending on what you do during the game, you get the most likely outcome.
As a programmer myself, and I am not an expert on this, just a basic, run of the mill programmer, I see things that lead me to believe that the game is fixed. If the game is live, and your changes can affect the outcome, why do they have to lock the game 3-4 minutes before it starts? To me, that is when the game matrix works out the final results and creates the commentary to go along with the predetermined results.
This is starting this all over again where I cant prove it is fixed and you cant prove it is not fixed. All we can do it agree to disagree.
I still don't think that the games are predetermined when you for example make a substitution, and the substitute scores later in the game, but yes neither of us can prove our points, although since you're a programmer yours might be more valid. Yeah we'll have to agree to disagree.
