Season 36

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tornado88

Gutted! My first champions league final and I came so close ..and against a much better rated team! :(

---

Too bad... better luck next season!

Btw... I just won my 3th champions league in a row.... *is happy* :D :D :D

It was a close one though. Opponent played with a solid defence and had some good chances to score, but in the end it was my favorite striker who scored the 0-1 in the 87th minute!

In a surprise move, Razz Rangers last night announced the signing of veteran defender Laurens Van Den Bosch.
Attachment 1793
Our depth on defence has been thin for awhile and we just had a great opportunity to bring in a veteran with such defensive skills. Clearly not a long term signing, and his skills may be on the decline, but Van Den Bosch can help anchor the defense and be a calming force for the younger players. It's unknown whether he will play in this evenings Champion's League final, although he will be on the active list. Razz has announced that George, Salomen, Marzuki and Lucik will be inactive. The team seemed in high spirits this morning as they boarded the plane for Johannesburg, South Africa where the match will be played at the Calabash.
http://images.supersport.com/FNB-Stadium-2013.jpg

Maybe we can share the plane home.
Here's hoping we both have something to put the champagne in, preferable silver in colour.

Ravers lead 0-1 at HT

0-2 after 47 min. COYB's

Sherwood injured in the 89 minute.
Ravers win 1-3 YES! get in.

Edit to injury nerves! lol

Well done Accyrover :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dv8r

The fans were out in numbers waiting to see legendary Chano Petersen

---

They should be out on the lash before the game.

Tonight I will play my 4th CL Final. So cross your fingers for Botev Plovdiv!!! :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Accyrover

Pondering what to do.

AS Roma plays the same formation for every game, never changed it once.

3DCs 4-1-2

My normal counter for this leaves his ML the only player where my players do not have better quality the difference is significant, my player is 37 his 43. 3-3-2-1-1 attacking through the centre would be my counter.
Which doesn't look to bad the difference is more apparent in the roles they will play his AML/ML has attack 42.6 while my DMR/MR has 32.6 defensive
My three DC's are all 1-4 skills higher than his strikers.
I could use a asymmetric 3-2-2-2-1 which would mean 2DC's and push the other DC/DR to DR, move the DMC over one square so he is in between the AMC and the line of attack the AML/ML would take which also the DR with red arrow should pick up.
The advantage of the Asymmetric it gives me the ability to attack down both flanks were he has no cover at all with the exception of his MR/ML and gives me two AM's and a striker against his three DC's, my AM's have over 60 goals between them.

So do I go normal and risk the ML skinning my DMR or go for him.

Over to you for opinions.

---

Sounds as if you've thought it through .. so go with it. Do you need the second AM* in this case though? Can you make it a 3-2-3-1-1 with a versatile player so you can shift back to 3-3-2-1-1- without subbing?

EDIT: Ah, I'm slow!
Congratulations Accy!

we are the championnnnnnn myy friennddddddd wohooooo

Attachment 1797 Attachment 1798 Attachment 1799