hmmm, looks like i found something out
So, if it takes me this long to find out, and believe me, I would have remembered this if someone told me, why did Nordeus not publish this or say something about it?
Curious yet?
Do you really want to know?
OK. here goes.
Here is my game yesterday in one of my accounts:
http://i60.tinypic.com/5djloh.png
Have you figured it out yet?
No?
Let me help you.
Needless to say I won, but the important thing is look at his GK.
http://i57.tinypic.com/j7usu0.png
See it yet?
No?
He gets injured you say? but how is that relevant? What are you trying to say?
OK, here is a little more info to help you: the GK wasnt replaced, surprise, surprise. but thats not the point.
http://i62.tinypic.com/2q88wfl.png
Do you see it yet?
No?
Awww, do I have to spell it out for you?
You took all the fun out of it. OK, here goes: The ST was playing GK after he was unable to continue.
How do I know this? Look at the comments in the first picture in the 89'.
http://i61.tinypic.com/210cdxi.png
Funny how the GK is injured, doesnt get replaced and he has no defence at all and a red carded player. This is the sort of game that should be 11-0 for me, but as usual, once the GK is injured you rarely score any goals...I scored just one.
But I digress. My player was fouled in the 89' and took a freekick where there should be no GK, but lo and behold! Zalewski, the ST made a GREAT STOP! a Striker!
So now we have proof that some player takes over GK duties in a ninja-like fashion if there is no auto-replace or player initiated sub.
The question I have is this: what determines which player is chosen to play GK in this case? I would hardly have chosen an ST, and I seriously doubt that that ST had the best defensive capabilities.
But that raises another question: why has Nordeus never said anything about this?
and one last question: why doesnt the other team sign that ST as a GK??? This upstart 3* ST stopped my 5* ST from an easy goal. Professional jealousy perhaps?
