Printable View
But the purpose of power training is just to increase the quality of the player. That does not guarantee good performance of a player. I have a under perform player where I train him up from 4 stars to 6 stars, he still had bad performance everytime.Quote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
Then there is no point train them to have SA. And we need 50 skill points to train them... It's ridiculous. Better find in transfer market better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Castreal
Just by having SA does not mean that he'll be good at that particular ability. SA increases existing points ability for that particular trait. If he is One-on-One SA, then he'll have increased % in one on ones. If he sucks at freekicks, giving him a FK SA does not mean he'll be better. Buying existing SAs is a gamble. Creating one means you have more control on which player gets it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yen N Yik
Take for example, you have a young AML - a fast trainer, who constantly provides assist at corners. Without the SA he is already good. If you add the SA, he'll be even better. Same goes to players who do well with FKs. Giving him FK SA will increase is conversion rate from say, 80% to 85%.
SA is not a necessity but good to have on the right players.
The most basic thing you can do is switch players from left to right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yen N Yik
If you play two strikers and they dont score as much, then switch them - the left to right, and vice versa. Same goes to players in midfield. Switch left, center or right. Some players play better on one side.
Also, there are some STs who play better alone and some STs who play better with a partner, this is also true for MCs.
If you encounter a stronger opponents and your players perform badly, how do you know whether it's because of your player's position is wrong or it's just because your opponent is stronger than u?Quote:
Originally Posted by Qambu Yaasi
Another thing I want to ask is, if one of your player (ie: MC) injured or red card, you replace him with another player who perform well but different position (ie: AMC)? Or you replace him with a player with the same position (ie: MC) but perform badly everytime?
If I knw the AMC can perform well as MC, then I'll put him on. If you do not know this, then I'll just go for the correct position.
The question to all your answer is by playing matches, then you will know. I don't have a black and white answer to that. Has to be your own judgement. We in the forum can only guide, but you have to experience it yourself.
Sometimes your team performance is depend on your opponents also. If you play with a weaker team, your players will perform well. If your opponent is strong, your players most of the time will perform badly... So, it's very hard to judge a player can perform or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Qambu Yaasi
It's very hard to try by my own because one mistake, then you will lose your match. Sometimes, you even could not figure out what is the mistake.... Is it player position problem, or formation problem, or its just your opponent is just stronger than you. There's too many things to consider here.
I think like I said before in an earlier reply, playing a weaker team does give you an idea of your players. If your player CANNOT perform against a weak team with so many players out of position then he definitely is a useful player and deserves to be sold.
One thing I can tell you, try to play 4-2-2-2 Hexagon or 4-4-2 classic and play the players who you think will perform. Try it for 3 matches and see who is giving you consistent rating. Then retain those, replace the non performing ones with your sub/reserves and try another 3. Im pretty sure you will have a decent idea who is who and who is not supposed to be in your team
T11 is not rocket science. It throws you odd results here and there but it is not a complicated match engine.
My formula for WINNING is : ABKI BAAR MODI SARKAR...:)...