Printable View
I noticed a good correlation between injuries frequency and players weight. Heavier players seem to be more "robust" and less likely to injury. On the contrary, most of my lighter players show the tendency to stop time to time... I've got a very light AMC (69kg!!!), he injuried 3 matches in a row
What about your experience?
curious that our players have the same weight during alll his career... in a summer I won some Kg.... LOL
Only fitness conscious players are allowed to play in TOP11...:D...Quote:
Originally Posted by khris
BIG LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Siddharth Shanker Singh
and is not more big coz there's no 8 size lol
if I were you, I would stop trying to find any logic to this game. Always bear in mind this is a simple application. The only correlation you can find is that when a bug makes money, then it's probably not a bug.
At least that's my experience, as you were asking for it...
Just 1 word. Placebo.
Yes, I do agree with you, that there is no logic in this game...:D...But people still fail to realize it...:D...Quote:
Originally Posted by brunom14
I think it's an interesting theory, I have never paid attention to weight. I will look at my team's injuries from now on and see if I notice any link.
You say that he was injured 3 matches in a row. Maybe that's the problem. You must be using the red packs to heal him and then playing him again in the next match. If he has short term injury, try letting him recover naturally instead.
I rarely use red packs to heal players.
I'd be surprised it it didn't but the impact will be small in general and difficult to detect/test.
But it would be very easy for devs to turn various little variables into factors/co-efficients/multipliers such as performance co-efficient, injury co-effefficient, foul co-efficient etc. What else would the coders have had to do if not applying factors to decision outcomes.
that`s why i don`t play, just manage and eat all the Pie`s :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Siddharth Shanker Singh
dont think weight matters and height only for aerial def
Yup I agree with reddeviljohn. As some of you said it's just a correlation ...