Quote Originally Posted by Stafford View Post
Formations, eh?

I'm playing 3-1-3-1-2, or

-------ST---ST-------
---------AMC---------
-ML------MC-----MR-
---------DMC---------
-----DC--DC--DC----
----------GK---------

What do you think of that, Pojacanje?
I disslike plain AMC, substitute is ok, but AMR/AML is better if possible. My preference is 3 DC, DMR+DML, 3MC and 2 ST. DMR/DML have DL/DR so I can transform formation in line 5 3 2. Although sub is available to rtansform it in 3DC, DMR DML, 2 MC, AML/AMR, 2ST. OR without DC and MC AMR/AML are substitutes.

DMC is not so ok with me. Many players prefer DC/DMC combo, to make middle stronger. I prefer sides.