Printable View
Hi
I know there are lots of different players on the transfer market at any one time...but
Which is the most important attribute to look for from the above?
I know high stars will be good ....and low wages but high value = faster trainer but
Where does the players value fit into the equation? I assume the higher the value the better the player but is a high value low stars player better than a low value higher stars player???
Any guidance appreciated.
If you see a good player with good ratings and 4-5 stars,buy him...dont waste your time looking at the wage or value...Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Baker
For my twopenneth, I always go for highest star rating, but, I have bought some duds by doing this. At the level I one of my teams is at (l31) virtaully all players cost 100m. I have personally put players on the market at the lowest available price just to sell them, so the price does not always reflect the quality of the player but may reflect how desperate the manager is to sell. I also always check his stats if they are available.
Hey pal, you know my opinion and theory about fast trainers.
But as I said in that post http://forum.topeleven.com/top-eleve...ad-player.html fast trainer (or expensive player) and good player are different things.
Scouts for example have medium value price but all the players I bought from scout list were good.
4 so far : DL/DC (defensive wall), MC (f-k specialist), DC/DMC (Header), MC (specialist) , all youngs, 22-23 y.o. and with q4 or q9.
Also some veterans x-scouts and medium value veterans I had were performing good.
The fast trainers have the advantage that can have bigger quality (faster and with less sources) than other players. Also they can last longer in high quality.
As about performance / rates of the players, this season I 'm starting to believe in a theory little different (at least for my team).
First I'm looking at Quality (STARS) then at age, wages,etc.