Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Multiple Position Eligibility

  1. 06-21-2015 #1
    Adam T. Brown
    Adam T. Brown is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    59

    Multiple Position Eligibility

    Quick question looking for confirmation: to better the use of arrows, is it preferable to have vertical multi-position eligibility (ie MR/AMR eligibility for MR->AMR arrow) rather than lateral (MC/MR) or single eligibility (just MR). Or put another way, does an MR with AMR eligibility play better with a red arrow than a MR without the AMR position eligibility? From the guides this seems to be the case and might explain low ratings of my single position eligible players that were given arrows. Thank you as always!
    Breached Protocol - look hard enough and you'll find one, somewhere, everywhere
    Season: 17. Level: 16.
    Competitions won: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Runner-up: 4
    Champions League won: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16. Third: 15
    Cups won: 2 [Level 3], 4 [L6], 10 [L13], 14 [L17], 16[L19]. Runner-up: 7 [L9], 11 [L14], 15[L18]. Third: 6 [L8].
    TRIPLE CROWNS: 14, 16
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-21-2015 #2
    Adam T. Brown
    Adam T. Brown is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    59
    Oops sorry guys! Meant to put this in tactics...doh!
    Breached Protocol - look hard enough and you'll find one, somewhere, everywhere
    Season: 17. Level: 16.
    Competitions won: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Runner-up: 4
    Champions League won: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16. Third: 15
    Cups won: 2 [Level 3], 4 [L6], 10 [L13], 14 [L17], 16[L19]. Runner-up: 7 [L9], 11 [L14], 15[L18]. Third: 6 [L8].
    TRIPLE CROWNS: 14, 16
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »