Attachment 58156
Printable View
Pls tell me what is this with this formations what is this?????what the game is this??????????
it is a lost game against a strange formation, that is what it is, a defeat :rolleyes:
why not use wingers against such a weak formation?
not very surprising, you should add some wingers, i stopped using formations with 3 strikers long time ago, they are crap
4-5-1v or 3-5-2v would of destroyed that. He has 4 down the middle, you had 3, because you don't have wingers it would of been difficult to play down the middle. I'm guessing you playing down the middle, right? He has 1 CB so you should of played long passing.
I just played against a 4-2xCM-2xAMC-2... The hell if I'm playing through the middle lol. I played 4-2-2-2 hex and won 0-4
I don't know about you guys, but I'd just play my regular stuff (never 3 strikers) down the left wing - he's inviting you to acres of unoccupied space. Of course, if you don't play wingers other than the fullbacks, that might not work lol
he have one DC and one DL this is him defence!!!!
3 forwards VS one DC and One DL and 0:1 wtf???????????
Omg go try versus someone with just 2 defenders and win!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What does it matter where I'm from?
Sorry about the quality, it's on my mobile.
Attachment 58168Attachment 58169
Attachment 58170
This guy played 2xDC-1-3CM+RM-3 he had a CB sent off in the 89th minute
I countered with 4-3-2w-1
Although I agree that ST aren't good as they used to be, I think that team success is individual and varies from team to team.
My main team is 2nd in similar quallity league, all strong 5*, has 21 players, with constant tactics and formations adjustments. Meanwhile, 1st team in league has only 14 players, 3 on bench are GK and 2 mildfielders (one 3*, one 4*), uses 433 shield formation (DMC+2MC mildfield). His team has all victories besides 1 defeat. I had check out, he uses same line-up and formation whole season and has such good stats, so it isn't rule. Also, few seasons ago I saw one team with quite weak squad (av. 3*) which used 5-2DMC-MC-2ST formation and somehow managed to finish in top 4 and left behing 5* teams.
TELL ME ONE TEAM IN THE HISTORY OF THIS PLANET WHO WIN GAME AWAY WITH 2 DEFENDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!TELL ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!TELL ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!oNE TEAM IN THE HISTORY WHO WIN GAME AWAY WITH JUST 2 DEFENDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
I understand your frustration, but lets be clear:
do not expect too much from top eleven. It is app, not perfect and realistic football managers. That's why football manager takes some gigabytes of space on your HDD while TE doesn't (at least for PC).
So, reduce your expectations from this game. Of course it is frustrating when game trolls someone, like losing against team who had red card or against team which uses weird formation. It happens to both newbies and experienced, high level players.
Although we had many suggestions and requests for changes, only few of them were actually realised (such as live player rating during match, which was introduced few months ago although game exists for 5 years).
Save your nerves (and money) for something more valuable than this app :)
Ok, now seriously, thats a simulator, and 1st are under all, the players, and their internal skills. time ago we had rules, about illegal formations. Now do not exist.
I always defended that have to exist to at least have acceptable formations to face, same with the players under the field, we should see always 11 under the field not 4-5 like when contracts are not expired and teams are abandoned.
Game need some little changes, hope in some time will consideer some changes about that.
Look, it's one match, it was a bad result - we all get those from time to time. Let off steam by posting a screencap in Vent and/or Unsatisfactory Result threads and move on. No need to subject us all to several pages of cussing and shouting...
...which is why I asked the question in the first place, remember? We have folks down here in Swindon who talk/type like that, too, you know. A bit further down South, we also have people who, when asked where your things are, reply with 'there on there way'...
So, because I know my spellings, I can't be British, but it's ok?
I should've never started this, I could have known better, no, I should have known better.
Never mind.
Last season, in cup semi-final. 1st match (away) I won 2-1 (I'm stronger). Then in the 2nd match (I was home) I couldn't believe in my eyes when he (the other team) suddenly scored 3 goals in about 5 mins. The result wass 0-3. Although I was tronger and had more shots, much more ball possession (aboud 65-35%), more free kicks, more corner kicks, and I watched both 2 matches (he didn't)
This season, it happened the same to me in cup. The away match was a draw 2-2, but I had so much pressures on him and he was lucky to scored 2 goals in 10 last mins. The 2nd match (I was home), he suddenly scored 3 goals in first half (Damn it!!!). The result was 1-3. Of course I was tronger and had more shots, much more ball possession, more free kicks, more corner kicks, and I watched both 2 matches (he didn't), like that other game I told.
I think they had changed the programme simulation for the abnormal results (the weaker team win) to appear more often. It happened for 1-2 months.
I was kind of prepared to just leave it, but you had to come back. OK.
If the 'off-topic' setting is bugging you, I'd be happy to create a new thread and carry on there, just say the word.
Now though:
1. Do yourself a favour and do a search on the net; type 'should of' and see how insulting you find the search results.
2. By using nonsensical items such as 'could of', 'must of' etc., it's actually and really you who's doing the insulting.
Finally, the worst is the effect on people whose first language isn't English (they're struggling hard enough as it is from what I can see/hear), or those who are still young and learning.
I mean, nobody seems to give a rat's behind about the odd typo, anyway; I've learnt to live with that, although I really think some of the bigger and more 'reputable' companies should get someone to proof-read things like 'Are the labels on your equipment correctly?'. I once saw a Lidl advert raving about some food stuff and 'it's taste' *facepalm*.
I've seen the eyes of all sorts of 'well educated' folks (e.g. management and science graduates) glaze over when confronted with whether it's 'there', their' or they're', or whether it's 'it's' or 'its', so you're in 'good' company.
However, I felt I had to draw the line when my daughter (she was 10 at the time) used a 'should of' on me.
Back to you, gunman
I'm sorry, is this you winning the argument? I'll never know because I got bored half way through.
I'm not going into a pointless discussion about literature on a forum about an app. Go correct some nursery kids.
Edit: Did you actually type 'should of' into Google to backup your argument???? Hahaha