Well I tested and saw it well, against a lower Q. team I saw the attack players active and did not miss the ST/'s, now I need test against a same Q . team maybe,,, but...
Tests allowed to be shared^^
Attachment 63862
Printable View
Well I tested and saw it well, against a lower Q. team I saw the attack players active and did not miss the ST/'s, now I need test against a same Q . team maybe,,, but...
Tests allowed to be shared^^
Attachment 63862
All my strikers are good for is laying off balls to my midfielders and keeping their CBs occupied, but it works so I won't complain. Surely you can afford the 11 rest packs for a real friendly khris :)
I think you'll have trouble vs formations with double DMCs that man mark tackle hard but I can see it working vs most even quality teams without managers present.
my main ST is not scoring....but my sub ST score 1 every game right now -.-....but if i put the sub ST to first 11....he won't score =.=!!!
surely that is a mistake....main ST won't score...and the sub ST only score when sub him in-.-!!
I had a friend on the game that never used strikers and managed to crush teams.
His favourite was 4-3-3
DL, DC, DC, DR, MC, MC, MC, AMC, AMC, AML
Not really if you think about condition usage and the effect subbing a lower rated player. Last season i had a stretch where my strikers would only score if I subbed them after the order was given but before they came off. It's like they were spiting me for my decision. Jerks.
My STs have not not scored yet. :cool:
Test 2:
Attachment 63872
Attacking midfielders can deputise for strikers, but they are expected not to be as effective. Your test is not valid. You need to test it many times, first with strikers while maintaining the other variables (team composition, tactics, condition and moral) you can control the same, and then repeat with attacking midfielders in the place of the strikers. This experimentation has to be done again and again using different opponents close to that of your team's quality, and then with different tactics. Only then, you can prove to some extent if your theory is wrong or right.
(B.T.W, hi. :) )