@ BeckStar,
If that´s the case how have I been offered a AML/ ST for the last 4 weeks when the AML/ AMR /AMC / ST grouping is by far my strongest ?
Printable View
@ BeckStar,
If that´s the case how have I been offered a AML/ ST for the last 4 weeks when the AML/ AMR /AMC / ST grouping is by far my strongest ?
Upload a picture of your team and let me see it.
Write quality of each player aside- Im sure there's a logical explanation to your case
Aside that, AML/ST would be coming as ST/AML if im right ?
It's probabbly because you've got a weak ST on the bench ?
ST/AML is just an ST- they give him an extra position and that's an AML most of the times
Attachment 67748Attachment 67748
My 2 ST/ AML are 140% & 125%
Level 32 - the TM for 5* players is full of 28-31yo low-Q has-beens - scout market has decent enough players but with useless or incompatible SAs - no-one is selling in Negotiations, even with a several-T offer - I needed a left-sided defender - one match and he's a 6* player - you do the maths...
19 STs a row... isn't this overkill?
I have two seasons in a row got recommended players on day 1 of a season - both times the price and quality of the player is so wrong.
79 T for a 5* player, when it usually is 79 T for a 6* player. The 3 other offers last season was as expected, with a 6* player for 79 T. Only this offer on day 1 seems wrong.
With this lower quality, the prices normally are lower (compared to all the other screenshots in this thread). Only 1 other screenshot in this thread have the same price, and it sounds like this offer was also on day 1.
Attachment 67765
Attachment 67766
Does anyone know if its how the offer is supposed to be, or is it actually wrong?
Drud ,
I´ve had that a few times on day one of the season a recommended 5 star for 79 tokens .It seems as it´s a bug & with the change of seasons & you are getting offered last seasons player minus his 6th star.
Palace Terriers are still amongst the ST recommendations...
Attachment 67807