I build my team around a good DMC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Abhinavsharma
I can´t see my team without one
Printable View
I build my team around a good DMC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Abhinavsharma
I can´t see my team without one
What are the main formations you use?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunzo
Let's not expand to tactics here but to talk about players/positions and tactics.
Ok, DMC is also a key player for me.
I 've seen a lot of times players with only DMC position and to be honest, I prefer to have another player with worst characteristics but double position like DC-DMC.
I wish the game could offer players like DMC-MC - at least in scout list or recommended players.
I never seen so far (I 've seen in recommendations MC-AMC), so I build one DMC-MC with greens.
Even better is one DC-DMC-MC. Perfect for rotation and back-up.
Midf players
Not much to say about them.
I just like the idea to have the C-K sa and to set them in corner-kicks so to have my other attackers (ST and wingers) in the GK area.
I avoid to buy MR - ML as I 'm searching for MR-AMR and ML-AML.
Wingers , those are my favorite players but here there is a dilemma .
MR-AMR or AMR-AMC ?
AML-ML or AML-ST from recommendations ?
hmm
Well, my first priority is a MR-AMR & ML-AML players.
In some games vs tough opponents, I like to use 4-1-4-1 instead of 4-5-1V (same philosophy but more defensive).
So during the game, I can switch my MR-ML to AMR-AML or the opposite.
I found it useful many times.
but ok, as those positions are more rare, if I 'll find a AMR (L)-AMC young fast trainer, I 'll buy him.
Then, maybe I 'll play with the arrows. If want to use him like MR or more defensive, I 'll set a blue arrow on him.
if I 'll find a AMC-AMR or AMC-AML , I also give hime the other AM_ position so to have him as a back up for my two wingers.
Very good players you can find also from scout list. AML-AMC-AMR with shadow striker sa :D
An excellent choice to spend 60 T.
Of course you can find such players in the market some times (as ex-scouts from a higher lv team).
It's really worthy to go in a mini bidding war for those players.
With those three AMs , I like to set a 3-6-1 formation (3DC-1DMC-2MC-AML/C/R-ST) instead of 3-5-2V because two ST for me is not working anymore.
Multipositon players are great to come off the bench. But there usually isn't much need of multipositon MCs, and they don't seem to perform good enough, coz most teams use at least two MCs anyway...
Agreed. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Arion
Also, there is no need for so many multiple positions like some might think, and like some have done. If you can have them, that is you can farm a lot of green packs, then why not? Multiple positions provide the user with more possibilities and also for convenience. But, they are not necessary as such.
DC-DMC: ok
DMC-MC: ok, and might be even better than DC-DMC in some cases, but this combination is rare in this game. Most, if not all of those are due to training for the additional position.
AML-ML / AMR-MR: ok
AMC-ST: ok
AML-ST / AMR-ST: ok
MC-AMC-ST: not ok. Why? You can find this out yourself if you do some work.
DL-DML / DR-DMR: ok
AML-AMC-AMR: ok
AML-ML-DML / AMR-MR-DMR: acceptable
DMC-MC-AMC: may be acceptable, but it goes against the logic of football
I love them. I ensure that every wing player can play multiposition, since I had lot of problems with a single position leftback earlier... But I generally don't have problems with single position midfield players, and they seem to do better that way. All wing players have one thing in common — to cross the ball in, so that's why it seems that multipositional wing players do fairly well. But DC, DMC, MC, AMC/ST — all have different roles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactician
In my view there is no need of best position players, all u need is good chemistry team + inform players, even 4* players can play better than 5* players when they are in form,
Finishing my posts about positions I 'm gonna say about ST.
That's a tough case.
Some months ago I noticed that my STs stopped scoring.
That's why I started this thread to see if it was my fault and couldn't find the right players or it was something general
http://forum.topeleven.com/top-eleve...rs-lately.html
From then, not many things changed. Maybe little better the last two seasons.
So I stopped playing with 2 STs and use more AML-AMC-AMR + one ST for more attacking formations.
Also stopped investing in STs .
Sometimes, I just buy a simple veteran player from the market, setting in position and let my wingers scoring.
Also some times I bought a ST, young fast trainer from the market and gave him also a winger position (because nordgen STs are more common than wingers).
Also those recommended players who are playing ST+AM_ are good players (but it costs some tokens).
Of course later on, you can find them in the market when their managers level up.
Some times I do a rotation to keep them in form. For example I have a ST-AMR and a ST-AML. In some games I use the first as ST and in other games the other one as ST. When they're playing as wingers, they 're scoring a lot. When they're playing as STs no :(
But ok, they have good stats avg.
4-4-2Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactician