Season 89 Are you ready?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by talisman

Funny, I switched to that after they scored their second and after initially doing the trick, it killed off any progress my forwards were making and then seemed to make the situation worse...

It's the two AMCs that are the issue - I have two players who can play DMC but that would then put the defensive line in a bit of a state.

---

Man marking maybe and a 4 2dmc 1mc 2w 1. Long passes to the flanks.

Second team had only one target. Cup

First game at home 2-3. Final seemed difficult to reach.

But my players had an astonishing game, they even surprised me, I have not seen these players outplaying an oppo of such high quality.

Even the 7 saves of the oppo gk were not enough

Attachment 78093Attachment 78094
Attachment 78091
Attachment 78095

Wow Cloverfield, just wow.

Well done.

What is more important? Form or Skill ( quality ) ?

For example: 110% ( Form 6-6-7-5-6 ) vs 95% ( 8-7-7-6-9 ) , both Goalkeepers.

Well do you use against even matches both GKs?

Because if you use second Gk for easy games that you win and first to hard games that you lose, then form is not indicative and realistic.

First Gk in any way seems underperforming, not a single 8 and 5 is bad very bad.

We reached cupfinal today... it's our 7.cupfinal in a row.
Attachment 78098

We won semifinal 14:2 on aggregate... it's the highest victory this season at cup. The stupid thing about that: it was the strongest team. It was managed... I believe, Nordeus' RNG, AI,... or how you call it, is way too strong. It can't be, that we beat a managed, "only" 12% weaker team 14:2, while we made a lucky 3:2 against a 45% weaker, unmanaged (maybe only unwatched) team...
I really don't know, if I'm happy about reaching the final or mad about that ...... engine...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by k1tb

What is more important? Form or Skill ( quality ) ?

For example: 110% ( Form 6-6-7-5-6 ) vs 95% ( 8-7-7-6-9 ) , both Goalkeepers.

---

I was using my now second GK for 4 seasons including this one. He was always very solid with good ratings.

But after a string of unexplained bad performances (even my AM reported that he wasn't motivated enough for some reason) I promoted my second GK to starting XI.

I've got to say that I haven't even remotely regretted it. He's constantly putting 8 rated performances and living up to the task in general.

He had a little bit less quality at the start of the season but he's a fast trainer and already better in GK qualities than my other one.

My cup road to the final
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...619cc82823.jpg
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...2e7622b19f.jpg


Sent from my SM-A800F using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by axd23

I was using my now second GK for 4 seasons including this one. He was always very solid with good ratings.

But after a string of unexplained bad performances (even my AM reported that he wasn't motivated enough for some reason) I promoted my second GK to starting XI.

I've got to say that I haven't even remotely regretted it. He's constantly putting 8 rated performances and living up to the task in general.

He had a little bit less quality at the start of the season but he's a fast trainer and already better in GK qualities than my other one.

---

I used 10%+ lower GK in cup game and he was rated a nice 8 :) While at the first leg my "main" GK was rated 5.7 or something....

<Good luck Gert K

Attachment 78103
Attachment 78104