I agree.
His 4-4-1-1 (or 4-5-1) formation is a slightly better choice then your 3-1-4-2 (or 3-5-2) formation. Despite the fact that you have a scout team, his 5* players arent that bad either. Dont let one * more or less foul you.
Printable View
So smart and intelligent. As usual... None of your comments is constructive or useful... Just grow up, kid.
Need a proof? http://forum.topeleven.com/members/lola-milo.html
His 11 value isn't properly the same as shown in the statistic showcase. I myself noticed few days ago against someone who had all 1* reserves being Q20, while he had effectively a 28-30 Q on the field. I do think 2-3 isn't a big troll, depending on tactics. If he played defensive and counter, might be the reason.
Well, here is his team.
Attachment 4168
Personally, I agree with the earlier post that tactics was probably the culprit. Plus the fact that I love to see scout teams lose to weaker teams.
I think your formation was a perfect defensive counter vs the 4-4-1-1 but not the best offensive counter.
I might have tried the 4-4-2 narrow diamond since 4-4-1-1 is so close to 4-4-2. I am not a big fan of playing 3 DC vs a 4-4-2 unless you play 3-4-3 for the barn burner.
Just write it off as bad luck...these games happen more frequently than you know.
Did I mention that I usually have no sympathy for scout teams that lose? ;)
avenger has been a d*ck on the forums lately; surprised he hasn't been banned yet
and WOW. 60% possession? that must have been tough to swallow. is this really what I'm going to expect in higher league?