Seriously? NO WAY!

[Zeon]

there are fans of every Premiere League Club in every European country i'd guess

He used one amc for one st having a slight number advantage at midfield. Would you have used aml+amr for obe of your sts playing on flanks you prolly woulda havw won by huge gap. Clashing on playing same tactics results in leveling equally both sides. You had better players, he had one more at midfield.

you think small changes like that make really that big differences? if so i should learn how to make good formations^^

[Morgan O'Bree]

there are fans of every Premiere League Club in every European country i'd guess


you think small changes like that make really that big differences?

Who talked about big difference? Ohi mate, it was 1-1. Not 6-1. Nor 1-6. Surely Barca had about 5 Q better for his effective 11 but that small change could very possibly mean the difference between 0-2 and 1-1. And facts are the game was balanced with the same number of shoots and slightly little difference in ball possession. It's not like there was a predominance on a side an a goal popped out randomly.

Another small particulat, as you define them: his DMC had red arrow while the oponent plaid an AMC: what do you think would happen if that AMC had a red arrow?
2,3,4 small changes makes a difference in the end.

I would like to know who was the scorer for both teams, then we could actually check out something interesting, would we?

if so i should learn how to make good formations^^

Good formations are just formations. Either you win applying a counter or you just win due to your team's superiority in stats. 3-5-2 flat gets countered by 3-6-1 or 3-5-1-1 if you prefer.