Printable View
More surveys trying to engage managers feelings about the obvious failed new Token Packages. I warned managers before and warn them again. Just say NO!!!! IF WE REFUSE TO OVERSPEND ON GAMBLING for players they will get the message and stop ruining our enjoyment in this game. Most of you have already witnessed their nonsense. Please just refuse to let their GREED!!! win.:mad:Attachment 88332Attachment 88333Attachment 88334Attachment 88335Attachment 88336
Why all the surveys are for English managers ?
I didn't have any of those @seanmeg posting.
@SeanMeg
I would not mind selecting the 3rd option on that last image :)
99T for 4 players ... age 18-21...5-8*... 1 SA...we select positions....What more do you want :D
Its a pretty good deal.....lower age than scouts...chance of better quality
I want the old auctions market.Quote:
99T for 4 players ... age 18-21...5-8*... 1 SA...we select positions....What more do you want
I was waking up early in the morning and with half of those tokens I could buy 11 players, 18-19 y.o. and fast trainers.
Ok, all of them 5* but really how many chances do you believe that you 'll have for a 8* player ?
Others spent 400-700 and got none.
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ποσιδονας
Old TM is better than current one.
But I doubt its ever coming back.
Given that, I would definitely like to see that last option to get 4 players for 99 tokens.
Not saying that I WILL use it, but Im sure a lot of folks will.
I still prefer getting the players from regular auctions and I keep mine for around 8-10 seasons.
Use my tokens to train, not to shop!
Old transfer system was better for sure but could exploit it easily, the new system is solid
an brings more profit to nordeus so thats it.
I think we must propose a transfer system that would be more profitable for nordeus
than this one and more convenient for players.
I think this survey makes sense. I prefer that to a change coming from nowhere. I prefer to have these offers to choose from and keep the option to say no than nothing. Agree that the 3rd entry on page 4 is good and I would go for it. But a couple of funny things: 2 SA for only 1 player (entry 3, page 3 and entry 2, page 4) ! Makes me think that these propositions are just randomly generated...
At least, it shows in a way that Nordeus acknowledge on their failure with the first packs. When I go to the supermarket and I buy a pack, there are 2 winners: 1) Me, because I get 6 bottles of ? for the price of 4 2) The shop, because I spent more money even if I was not that thirsty. In Nordeus' first packages, there was only one winner with 2 bottles for the price of 5...
If this does become a permanent feature running alongside the current auction system my worry would be that the quality of players available at auction would drop. Thus forcing us to resort more often to this "scouting" system in order to find quality players without having to use hundreds of rest packs to powertrain them.
Auctions filled with 80-90% players would push us in this direction and empty our token savings quicker.
Thanks for sharing these pics...although, there is nothing which appeals to me as Cost viz-a-viz Risk is super-high when buying from Scout.I may stick to TM (although it also sucks now) and Negotiations.
I wish I knew to whom surveys are sent...
Never got one..
They just send them to nice people !;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloverfield
Those surveys as I can see so far in the forum, are for managers of "wealthy" countries, like England, USA, Germany or France because from there are the token buyers or people with a lot of farming from providers.
Where I submit that I am a nice person? :pQuote:
Originally Posted by gizzmo
but you aren't a token buyer
hahaha
I'm in Uk but i never had a survey for my main team(connected with fb) but i had for a team connected with google account.
Its only google accounts that ive had surveys on as well .
You would not be delighted if you got two or even three goalkeepers or positions you least need. This is and has happened already when gambling for unknown players, Be warned !!!
You would not be delighted if you got two or even three goalkeepers or positions you least need. This is and has happened already when gambling for unknown players, Be warned !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by gamer5289
That option says we can select the EXACT position.Quote:
Originally Posted by seanmeg
Now, why would you select 3 GKs in that case?
Because i understand it as we would have the option to choose defense,midfield attack, i see no guarantee that we can depict right or left sided players,dual positions or even a mixture from defense,midfield or attack. I agree some managers will like to try it out but it would only be put in place in order to extort more Tokens, and in my 5 years + experience just further ruin the game for many managersQuote:
Originally Posted by gamer5289
They have 2 options there:
1. You can chose the specific role of the players -> exact position
2. You can chose the group of roles (def,mid,attack) -> This is inline with what you think.
The 99T option means exact position.
I would really recommend the folks receiving this survey to PLEASE go through properly and select what you would like :)
Just random clicks will lead to further deterioration of the game.
Pity, I never get these surveys!
Okay, so you can choose between dc, mc, amc, st. 4 players with age between 18-21 and with SA. C'mon, is it not worth it?Quote:
Originally Posted by seanmeg
