The Vent Thread

Out of Champs league lost 2-1 home & away against 3W-1-3W-1-2 similar quality although I am slightly better, but just can't seem to play this formation, 1st leg played 3N-5-2 and 2nd leg played 4-1-3N-2 FFS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neoklhs

You Trully.. f@ckin bastards... i will not post a f@cking photo cause you will never even see it.. i will tell you one thing.. i played with a worst team again with me ... with Random names like KOstas KAtsouranis ..... Didie Drogba bla vla vla ( he spend TOkens like this) he even had a Symbol that buy it with 50 tokens.... and i lost at semifinals for Cup 1-3..... with a system that Counter Attack the n0rmal 4-4-2 system.... you F@cking Euro Bastards.. that your F@cking game machine gives more to those that spend tokens on this f@ckin game.... many many TEAMS are Ghost .. cause of this... IDIOT behavior of yours.. wake up and play fair and square this f@cking game... i had BALL possesion + 15 % at my field and i lost? WTF you morons.. get lost... nordeus you are trully cheaters... bye bye from me.. gl hf

---

You got beat off of a token buyer? what is the problem????

Just played a match against an opponent with matching skills. He played 4-4-1-1 and so I countered with 3-2(DM)-4-1, playing defensive mentality and force counter-attacks. Wanna know what happened? According to the comments, HE GOT A COUNTER-ATTACK EVERY 5 MINUTES AND I GOT 2 FOR THE WHOLE MATCH!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Narf

Just played a match against an opponent with matching skills. He played 4-4-1-1 and so I countered with 3-2(DM)-4-1, playing defensive mentality and force counter-attacks. Wanna know what happened? According to the comments, HE GOT A COUNTER-ATTACK EVERY 5 MINUTES AND I GOT 2 FOR THE WHOLE MATCH!

---

if you people think formations decide the result, you are gonna have a bad time.
i should start a topic - "FORMATIONS ARE OVERRATED"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brezz

if you people think formations decide the result, you are gonna have a bad time.
i should start a topic - "FORMATIONS ARE OVERRATED"

---

I am not complaining that I lost - I didn't even say that I lost, although I did. But credit for that is given to the crappy game engine as if you look at the two teams, formations and tactics (yeah, I don't know his tactics, but still ...) then the only expected outcome of that match would've been a draw or a minimal win for either of the teams. And that's with no more than goal by a team scored in each of the cases. The 3:0 loss that I suffered are far detatched from any football logics.

Still, that wasn't my point - my post was mainly about the team instructions. How can you play a defensive game, relying on counter-attacks, where your players are supposed to stay in their half, and yet the other team gets 20 counter-attacks and you get 2?
I know that the comments are put there for entertainment purposes and that they don't mean ****, but seriously - this was way out of line.

But since you started it - if formations and tactics don't influence the result, then what the hell does? Pure randomness?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Narf

I am not complaining that I lost - I didn't even say that I lost, although I did. But credit for that is given to the crappy game engine as if you look at the two teams, formations and tactics (yeah, I don't know his tactics, but still ...) then the only expected outcome of that match would've been a draw or a minimal win for either of the teams. And that's with no more than goal by a team scored in each of the cases. The 3:0 loss that I suffered are far detatched from any football logics.

Still, that wasn't my point - my post was mainly about the team instructions. How can you play a defensive game, relying on counter-attacks, where your players are supposed to stay in their half, and yet the other team gets 20 counter-attacks and you get 2?
I know that the comments are put there for entertainment purposes and that they don't mean ****, but seriously - this was way out of line.

But since you started it - if formations and tactics don't influence the result, then what the hell does? Pure randomness?

---

everyone still waiting for this answer from Nordeus. many people asked already

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Narf

I am not complaining that I lost - I didn't even say that I lost, although I did. But credit for that is given to the crappy game engine as if you look at the two teams, formations and tactics (yeah, I don't know his tactics, but still ...) then the only expected outcome of that match would've been a draw or a minimal win for either of the teams. And that's with no more than goal by a team scored in each of the cases. The 3:0 loss that I suffered are far detatched from any football logics.

Still, that wasn't my point - my post was mainly about the team instructions. How can you play a defensive game, relying on counter-attacks, where your players are supposed to stay in their half, and yet the other team gets 20 counter-attacks and you get 2?
I know that the comments are put there for entertainment purposes and that they don't mean ****, but seriously - this was way out of line.

But since you started it - if formations and tactics don't influence the result, then what the hell does? Pure randomness?

---

u think Barca and Real think the 0-4 and 1-4 is logic? sometimes u lose, deal with it

just to know : the comments show you how often you shot on the target and how many occasion you/opponent have during the match , i do watch what is the "commentator" says about the match so i change tactic from defensive to offensive ... etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brezz

if you people think formations decide the result, you are gonna have a bad time.
i should start a topic - "FORMATIONS ARE OVERRATED"

---

You should, id be interested in reading it as i have my own theories on formations and counters

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by herdo

You should, id be interested in reading it as i have my own theories on formations and counters

---

nah, i am too lazy for that :) + its unpredictable at all. i am sure everyone can come up with an example countering what other people say. its just ridiculous to think there is a formation that garantied you good result. imagine this: u are playing vs opponent with DL-DC-DR and you putting 3 STR against his only DC. then u lose and wondering HOW the F**K :) other people easily can say: "he is controling the centre with his 4 players there vs ur 3" :) and then starts other examples ;)