Can anybody explain this problem to me?

[wanboo237]

Can anybody explain this problem to me?

Why? I don't understand what i seen.

[fall]

your keeper had nothing to do. he didnt play badly, he just didnt have a save to make, their shots on target will have been blocked by players

[wanboo237]

your keeper had nothing to do. he didnt play badly, he just didnt have a save to make, their shots on target will have been blocked by players

But we saw at picture, my keeper had 2 times saves, my opponent is Zero

[flatthg]

He might catch two corner Kicks

[magic3]

just because he had two good saves doesn't mean that he had a good game and didn't look bad at other times, missing the ball on corner kicks, etc. If you have no saves, it doesn't mean that you played bad.

With that said, do not pay close attention to the stats in this game as you will be disappointed because of many inconsistencies.

[wanboo237]

and this is his form in ten matchs

it's very terrible

i lost 50 Token buy him

[flatthg]

I have a good Keeper and a good Def too, which you can see in my league Stats atm:

14 Games 14 Wins +82 Goals -2Goals Diff: 80

My Keeper feels most of the Time bored and results in only 5-6 Gameratings mostly. While the def is at a 7-9 Rating most of the Time.

[wanboo237]

With that said, do not pay close attention to the stats in this game as you will be disappointed because of many inconsistencies.

tks bro , i agree with you

[magic3]

I have a good Keeper and a good Def too, which you can see in my league Stats atm:

14 Games 14 Wins +82 Goals -2Goals Diff: 80

My Keeper feels most of the Time bored and results in only 5-6 Gameratings mostly. While the def is at a 7-9 Rating most of the Time.

same here. if you are winning, i wouldn't be concerned. It looks like OP won the game 6-0. Don't worry about what your GK did in a game like that. If you lose 3-2 against a weaker opponents and GK gets 5 or worse, then I'm worried.

[wanboo237]

I thinks he very like to read newspaper in the matchs

i thinks i have a good matchs but . . .