Right now, too many are buying a few really bad players so that their team average becomes much lower than what their starting 11 is.
I will face with my 29.8 avg value team a guy who has 29 in average value. Good and even, right? Nope! His starting lineup consists of only 37+ players while he has a few 15 star players in his team to lower the average.
Poor. Thanks to this i will earn a massive 150k from the cups. Brilliant! Thanks again Nordeus, your game is always the best
I do believe that the only base it on the top 11 players already. I recall July mentioning this a few times in other threads.
I bought loads of useless 3* players at the end of the season before last season and I lowered my Quality from 105 to 98. Then when the next cup draw got made I got put in against teams with around 105 quality rather than 98.
Haven't looked closer to this but July Fourth you never signed your lower players right? You can trick the system a little I think with having eleven higher players and then a bunch of dross. You will be paired in a crappier cup though and the higher level players will still get you in the end and you get no money.
We all know unsigned players dont change anything, the question is if signed do.
I did sign them, and I signed more unsigned. My quality would of been 95 If the unsigned players counted that season.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukilon
Im level 6. Q44.1 but still face Q 57 and 60.9 in the Cup :(
lowering the team quality by using bad quality player doesn't make sense..
I have already experienced it... :/
that's weird. i've seen three teams have 11-13 really good players and the rest are really, really awful. They've been in my cup despite having a starting XI that is much much better than anybody else's.
that's why i think that they are not counting the starting IX but the total
same here