Here we go again. I do NOT need any bs about tactics as I cannot be asked to listen the lame excuse for the troll game. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...e4998e1ffe.jpg
Lähetetty minun SNE-LX1 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
Printable View
Here we go again. I do NOT need any bs about tactics as I cannot be asked to listen the lame excuse for the troll game. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...e4998e1ffe.jpg
Lähetetty minun SNE-LX1 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
................................
Maybe NORDEUS seen you have your 9* player and programmed the game like this: No, mate, you re not winning this round.:confused:
Just curious, what is your and his ratings?
That shot efficiency, had a similar experience in the CL Round Of 16 in Late October, I drew 3-3, he had about 13-23 in that game, a 3-3 draw was the score.Quote:
Originally Posted by FC-Helsinki
He had 75% shot efficiency and I had a reasonably high 60% but it irritated me although we went through and won our back to back CL’s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I ve noticed that when ever Nordeus trolls you. The opponent Who should NOT be making it in any way or form has a very high **** efficiencyQuote:
Originally Posted by Max McClean
Lähetetty minun SNE-LX1 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
*shot lol
Lähetetty minun SNE-LX1 laitteesta Tapatalkilla
is it a stronger teamQuote:
Originally Posted by FC-Helsinki
Just curios how do you know? Are you on his friends list?Quote:
Originally Posted by theclubofwins
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just want to have a more objective look on this.Quote:
Originally Posted by FC-Helsinki
Stats means absolutely nothing at all if there are no formations and player quality available to show that how the 2 sides are lined up. These 2 setups determine the majority of games. Having better players bound to have better ratings, and that would not reflect proportionately on how the actual game panned out.
And to concede 4 goals in a competitive match is something unimaginable (and something I never experienced in close to 250 competitive matches) if you have the right man to close the space down at the right place. The high shot efficiency of opponents’ occasionally is the indication of a troll result, but you must have got some of the setup very, very wrong to let your opposition shooting 20 times if your side is supposedly the favourites with ‘only’ 25 shots. Tough luck if he shoots 10 times, 6 on target and 4 goals, but what we could do is minimise the shots against us to overcome the troll.
1 obvious flaw is that you played with short or mixed passing, as indicated by the very high 89% passing success rate (apologies if you did play long and still achieved 89%). Your team was not taking enough risk for more chances, while your opponent did a at least play mixed or long ball to create and score. In these high-scoring games, it’s all about creating and taking as many chances as possible if GKs were taking naps, so always long passing for more chances.
For you to also score 4 as well probably means both sides are set up to be ultra-attacking as there are a total of 45 shots. If I were right about the setup of these teams (prove me wrong there if you have the images, though I doubt it), then you were practically playing fire with ‘Russian roulettes’ by trying to outscore your opponent without any proper defending.
If you were losing by some 3 or 4 goals then have a comeback, then you indeed did very, very well; if not, then in-game you should have switched to playing defensive, counter and long ball. The chance is you would concede less and win by taking chances via counter.
My stat. Matches played: 249; Scored: 1369; Conceded: 75. The scored stat is icing on the cake with some high 7 or 8* attackers, but goals conceded shows how good a team is set up to ensure a tight game could be fought when we are having a very bad dice.
You have 240 wins and lost 2, and yes I conceded an average of 0.53 goals per game in over 900 matches, I played in stints as it said in my signature, well, all the info is in my signature, also,I played hard defending and scored around 3.4 goals average per game in that amount of game time, Hard defending suited my team well. And it was the first thing I used when I stated my first team in early 2017.Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@Max Yes, each different team has its basic strengths and it is up to us managers to take the most advantage of it. When we have a few very good defenders, plus 1 top ST or AML(R), then just do hard defending and counter. The chance is we will concede only a few and score 2 or 3 to win most games. You had a very good record of typically about 10-1-1, and that means you were fighting for all trophies until the last stage at least and are bound to win a trophy or 2 with that very low losing ratio.Quote:
Originally Posted by Max McClean
Until now I concede about 0.33 goal per match in 249, and scores about 6.5 goals per game, and there is always a balancing act that we have to take on about 60th minute if we keep attacking aggressively with hard attacking and high pressing for a few more goals at the risk of conceding 1. Some of those few goals were conceded because I simply want my attackers to get their 10.0 ratings for motm improvements, instead of a defender who still should have got motm until my side somehow concedes a goal just because the team is on ultra-attacking mode with all wing-backs up arrows too.
What I want to say is a team should be set up to limit the number of shots the other side could have, and utilise our attackers to focus their attacks on opponents’ weakness. Then games like 4-4 would not have happened (well, maybe 1 in 500 to 1000 games), and if it does happen, our bench players are there to turn up to take the chances to turn the game around. And if all fails, then that would have been a troll result of 1 out of 40-50.
With your points, I would have said it is around 11-1-1 but oh well, it is close enough and it does not really matter, you were saying that you conceding 75 goals in 249 matches (that is impressive) that is approximately 0.3012 goals conceded per game on average, mind is nearly doubt that but I still consider it good.Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
Your Record is even better averaging close enough to a 96-3-1 every 100 games or so.
I got ‘trolled’ once in 20 games while I played which is still quite small, (5%) of all matches.
Anyway with 4-4 draws like the result on the first post, I have experienced only one game in 904 matches where I drew 4-4, which was against an abandoned team but I will blame myself as my team’s condition being around 60% that day.
I had 3, 3-3 draws, 1 in the league which ended my 44 game winning streak in September 2018, Then I had 2 3-3 draws in one season, my second last one where I won the League, CL and Super Cup and Lost in the Final of the Cup:
I had my first 3-3 draw in the Cup Quarter Finals that season I was disappointed as I let go of a 3-2 lead in the last 15 minutes of the my home, I won the second leg 2-0 at home. My second 3-3 draw that season and my 3rd overall came in round 28 away in the round of 16 of the CL which had ended my 20 game winning streak in the CL, we were 3-1 down and we brought it back to level terms, we had the 3 away goals so that really helped us, we won the second leg 1-0 at home with a 90th minute winner.
And that is it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk