Can someone please explain this

[cracicot]

I played vs #1 in league today for first place and I won 1-0, BUT

I played for 75% of the game with 80/20 possession because of a possible illegal formation?



He changed the DML to a ST at the 75% mark of the game and the 80% possession for me started to go down and eventually got to 70% by the end of the game.

Is having 3 on any wing an illegal formation?

[jacksparrow]

your opponent have scout defender, that the simple answer, and why you used 2 wingers in right flanks???

[Ljepoje]

Yeah, it's "illegal". DL+DML+AMR : aren't recognized (max two)

[dv8r]

3 players on any wing is illegal.

[cracicot]

your opponent have scout defender, that the simple answer, and why you used 2 wingers in right flanks???

I used my DMR to neutralize his AML. 3DC to neutralize his 1 ST. 4 MC to equal his 3 MC + DML.

I thought it was a good counter and it worked.

As soon as he went to 4-4-2, I moved my DMR over to DMC so I had a normal 3N-1-4-2.

[cracicot]

Yeah, it's "illegal". DL+DML+AMR : aren't recognized (max two)

stupid rule. but thanks for confirming it for me.

[Ljepoje]

stupid rule. but thanks for confirming it for me.

It's a T11 rule ... I once saw a guy playing

-----ST----
AML----AMR
DML-DMC-DMR
DL--DC--DR

[Zeon]

yeah, there are some formations, that would make sense, but are illegal.


I used this one for a half, then I realized he has 80% possession, not me^^

DL-DC-DC-DR
DML------DMR
-----MC-----
AML------AMR
-----ST-----

[shwanko07]

3 players on any wing is illegal.

is it? first time i know that

[shwanko07]

It's a T11 rule ... I once saw a guy playing

-----ST----
AML----AMR
DML-DMC-DMR
DL--DC--DR

i seen a guy full of scouts playing.. am sure he was pi$$ed off the stupid engine playing 2W-2w-2W-2W-2 ...was that illegal ? i call it the "samurai" formation when you want to kill your team in an immediate effect
ha ha ha 4 at each side