Printable View
Today, I will be playing away against an illegal formation, narrow 3-1-3-3 with no AMs. My players are all 5*, his best players are two scout defenders, and a decent 5* goalkeeper. Do I need to put on a win bonus? I don't want to waste money, but I also don't want to drop points because of a stupid mistake.
I think you should be ok assaulting his flanks, assuming Nordeus Jinxeus engine doesn't decide to mess with u.
if you play with 4 5 1 v stile motivated you will win 4 or 5
because this formation is illegal and i played against this formation 2 times before but with v.hard attacking ... down both flanks .. mixed passing ... whole pitch ... no counter ... no offside trap ... zonal defense.
Thanks for the input, Locky and Adel. :) So do you both think I should put no win bonus? I was thinking about putting the minimum bonus, 2M for my level.
I was actually planning a slight variation of the butterfly as below:
---------ST----------
AML--------------AMR
ML---------------MR--
----DMC-----DMC----
-----DC--DC--DC-----
Defence very concentrated in the centre, attacks focused down the flanks. I also prefer to go just attacking, I don't believe in going to extremes anymore. If this formation is okay, I'd rather go with this, agree with your tactics though, Adel. :)
I often play a similar formation but with 2xAMC's, more balanced and the AMC's still seem to drift wide.Quote:
Originally Posted by Potemy
The win bonus, it's mentioned in the guides, so I'd imagine there is a % gain of some description, or is it another con, if it is I fell for it as I don't play without one, EVER! :(