I'm asking me what is better if you change your formation and adapt the opponent or keep your formation for each game ?
Printable View
I'm asking me what is better if you change your formation and adapt the opponent or keep your formation for each game ?
I used to change and adapt to fit my next opponent. But this season I have stuck with one formation (4-5-1V) and set of tactics and it has worked just as well, if not better!
I counter my opponent every game.
I'm keeping same formation always, is better I think :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Fliqpy
Yes but you need a bigger number of players also they won't develop so fast, if they won't play always.Quote:
Originally Posted by Potemy
hmmm.
PricopGeorgeCătălin i decide me for 2-2-2-1-3
but i'm not sure about the defensive either
--MC--MC--
---DMC----
DL-DC-DR
---GK-----
OR
--MC--MC--
---DMC----
DC-DC-DC
---GK-----
what do you think is better ?
They get training, though, won't they develop very fast also?Quote:
Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin
DL-dc-dr is onky good against 1 striker. Against 3 strikers you'll need Dc-dc-dcQuote:
Originally Posted by Fliqpy
Im using first one :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Fliqpy
A wide defence works against two strikers as well, I think. IMO a narrow defence will only provide more cover to the central ST. I usually have cover from DMs, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by dv8r