Formations after UPDATE

Guys, can you please use English here? -_- This is simply impolite. Go to PMs if you want to have a friendly chat.
Also, over-using bold tag doesn't make your words weight more, Kaizer Franz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toxcatl

By 4-3-3 I meant DL-DC-DC-DR ML-MC-MR AML-ST-AMR.
Sorry for confusing answer, I'd think I was talking about 3 ST. I wasn't.
Fixed.

---

I am confused by the position of 4 defenders. Do you put them in a line or put the wingers a little forward? Must i put dc behind my opponent's st? I have lost 4 games with more than 3 conceded goals...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toxcatl

Guys, can you please use English here? -_- This is simply impolite. Go to PMs if you want to have a friendly chat.
Also, over-using bold tag doesn't make your words weight more, Kaizer Franz.

---

Take care of your a** , i don't see " moderator " under your name ! But i really think you want to be mod of this forum !

he is right
there is a French section

it's spoiling k1tb's thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toxcatl

By 4-3-3 I meant DL-DC-DC-DR ML-MC-MR AML-ST-AMR.
Sorry for confusing answer, I'd think I was talking about 3 ST. I wasn't.
Fixed.

---

interesting, you mean you using 3 wingers each side and only one mc. those aml/r using far edge or end of top line which match preview shows 3 ST. is your rival were present at match time, if I would your oppo then I might try to change tactic to 'through the mid' and wants to see whats happen :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ibangali

interesting, you mean you using 3 wingers each side and only one mc. those aml/r using far edge or end of top line which match preview shows 3 ST. is your rival were present at match time, if I would your oppo then I might try to change tactic to 'through the mid' and wants to see whats happen :p

---

As I said, my MR and ML both can play MC (and they play MC in my default 451v). In that 4-3-3 I put them really close to MC box, almost on the border, so they gave possession on flanks and in the center. I had three my midfielders in the gaps between his midfielders. I don't think going through the middle would change things drastically.
I don't remember exactly about my AMR and AML, but I think I left them in the middle of their boxes.
The opponents were watching the games, and we changed formations in the 2nd half. I rarely, if not never, play the same formation for the whole match against equal teams.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toxcatl

As I said, my MR and ML both can play MC (and they play MC in my default 451v). In that 4-3-3 I put them really close to MC box, almost on the border, so they gave possession on flanks and in the center. I had three my midfielders in the gaps between his midfielders. I don't think going through the middle would change things drastically.

---

Cool, sound like its 4-3-2w-1 :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ibangali

Cool, sound like its 4-3-2w-1 :p

---

If you wish =]

Attachment 90916

thanks for the screenshot. On match time where mostly those ml/r play wing or middle?

my 2 mc always have ml/r positions, like; mc+ml+dml and mc+mr+dmr
I would try to see this tactic
thanks again

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ibangali

thanks for the screenshot. On match time where mostly those ml/r play wing or middle?

---

I honestly don't know. I don't pay much attention to the simulation. I should maybe, because some opponent's orders may be figured out of this, but mostly it is just an entertainment.