Guys, can you please use English here? -_- This is simply impolite. Go to PMs if you want to have a friendly chat.
Also, over-using bold tag doesn't make your words weight more, Kaizer Franz.
Printable View
Guys, can you please use English here? -_- This is simply impolite. Go to PMs if you want to have a friendly chat.
Also, over-using bold tag doesn't make your words weight more, Kaizer Franz.
he is right
there is a French section
it's spoiling k1tb's thread
interesting, you mean you using 3 wingers each side and only one mc. those aml/r using far edge or end of top line which match preview shows 3 ST. is your rival were present at match time, if I would your oppo then I might try to change tactic to 'through the mid' and wants to see whats happen :p
As I said, my MR and ML both can play MC (and they play MC in my default 451v). In that 4-3-3 I put them really close to MC box, almost on the border, so they gave possession on flanks and in the center. I had three my midfielders in the gaps between his midfielders. I don't think going through the middle would change things drastically.
I don't remember exactly about my AMR and AML, but I think I left them in the middle of their boxes.
The opponents were watching the games, and we changed formations in the 2nd half. I rarely, if not never, play the same formation for the whole match against equal teams.
Cool, sound like its 4-3-2w-1 :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Toxcatl
If you wish =]
Attachment 90916
thanks for the screenshot. On match time where mostly those ml/r play wing or middle?
my 2 mc always have ml/r positions, like; mc+ml+dml and mc+mr+dmr
I would try to see this tactic
thanks again