Help! Against 4-3-3-0! A formation without ST????

[Grandef]

I had a match with a guy using 4-3-3 formation. His squad was weaker than mine, but the interesting thing is he used a squad without ST.

DL - DC - DC - DR
ML - MC - MC
AML - AMC - AMR

At first I thought: "well it's gonna go easy". I chose 3-1-2-3-1 formation, with intention to control and pressing the midfield.
And then, he gave me a draw match 1-1
Did I do something wrong?

No you did nothing wrong. I don't try to find a logic in TE. Last season, I lost one match to a 32% team while I was 95% and then I won 10-0 the next time using the same formation. I happens to me one per season on average.

[Max]

No you did nothing wrong. I don't try to find a logic in TE. Last season, I lost one match to a 32% team while I was 95% and then I won 10-0 the next time using the same formation. I happens to me one per season on average.

I agree with you now, the first formation he listed was wrong and had weaknesses, I could not spot a weakened here, maybe except he had no ML/MR, his opponent had one but I doubt that made any difference.

I lost an 88 game unbeaten streak to a mediocre 70% team and then I beat him 9-0 in the next game.


Sent from my iPhone using by pressing the Reply button.