Search:

Balanced?! You only have two defenders. :p

Illegal. :)

Look at those matches and see whether he used this formation during the matches. It's rare, but some teams will go to the trouble of setting an illegal formation between matches to throw off...

Legal. :)

Legal, but you'll also have to look at other parts of the formation.

I think it's legal, but very odd.

Oh alright. You should have left it in the quote bubble or something. ;)

You'll be surprised what people come up with, though.

What do you mean it seems to meet all the requirements? You don't know why the formation is illegal? You sound like you think it should be legal.

She's playing with 11, but 5 of her starting 11 ran out of contract. I'd hazard a guess at a 4-3-3, possibly 3-4-3.

I think it would be, but it's not possible on T11 with only 3 striker slots. The closest you can get is 3-0-3-2-2.

What is FAO, and what did I say? Sorry, I make too many posts on here. :p

Not sure who first used the term illegal, I wouldn't exactly call it that. You have to agree that if you have noone on the left or right, then you're going to concede lots of possession. Yes, in real...

I don't think that's it, though. You play against plenty of abandoned teams with other players as GK, and you only get something over 70% possession most of the time. Very confusing, and there's also...

It's not, unless something is very wrong with the DR?

I'd guess 50-50 too, but not for that reasoning as it's not exactly a 30% possession loss, just definitely 80-20. I won't assume that it's 50-50 if legal because one side or the other will have the...

You got back to me a bit late, though, I had already played the friendlies, and then the server reset itself so my players were in very bad condition, luckily my final match was against the bottom...

I can test a few in friendlies today, but I'll have many players out of position. Do you think I'll still win? Roughly 85 average quality against maybe 25 average quality max? Level 14 against level...

So at least 1 player in the middle row? That second image makes it seem that there's nothing in having 4 players in the opponent's half.

Do you still have matches in which to experiment? Don't move the players too much, we know in 5-2-3, 2 MCs are illegal, but wide AMs aren't. Next, try wide Ms (ML and MR) or 2 AMCs.

I believe one...

Have you tried it with noone in the middle row? Meaning no M(L/C/R), maybe play with an AML, AMR and DMC, I believe that would be illegal.

The new statement for defenders is fine, I guess. :) I think we need at least one in the M row (ML/MC/MR), but at least 3 midfielders (yellow players). :)

And about the posting illegal formations,...

That's why I said maybe the team is weak and it's not illegal, but now I'm thinking we need at least 3 midfielders.

Looks fine to me, 5-2-3 is actually a real life formation, albeit a rare one. Maybe his team is just really bad, or maybe you need 3 midfielders? The yellow players, that is. :)



You don't need...