I am in an Assoc that bounces between Gold 1 and Platinum every other season or so. Basically we stay in Gold 1 and then every other season we win our way up to Platinum only to get demoted back to Gold 1 the following season.
What this means in terms of tokens is that when we go up to Platinum we celebrate the 100 token award but then when we get demoted back to Gold 1 we receive nothing and lick our wounds. Yet if we simply stay in Gold 1 season after season we get 50T each season. So it seems to me that, in regards to tokens, over a two season arc, achieving Platinum but then being demoted back to Gold 1 (100T + 0T=100T) is equal to maintaining Gold 1 over back to back seasons (50T+50T = 100T).
Is this how it should be? For a team that cannot consistently hold Platinum you seem to alternate between Feast and Famine whereas just maintaining Gold 1 you get a steady diet. It would seem to make more sense that if demoted from Plat back to Gold 1 you would still get 50 tokens and thus show a net gain versus simply holding in Gold 1. As this is not the case I am seriously considering advising my Assoc that we NOT try for Platinum but just continuously maintain Gold 1 as its a lot less work and stress than getting beat up in Platinum every other season.
Am I correct in that this is how things work? If so, any other managers facing this same situation and what strategy do you employ?