The competitiveness of the game by the confederations.

[RaulLopes]

I come here to expose indignation by the blindness of many coaches and managers of groups of people who have their confederations, nowadays the search for the top is dirty, has no search for knowledge to assemble the best team, has no search for knowledge to understand the mechanics of the game and win in the gameplay, but rather a tireless search to be the best with ease seeking to circumvent system, examples:

► Confederations that play with 7, 8 players in 160 – 180% and 5, 4 players 1% unpaid with unusual performance beating theoretically better opponents with the 11 players paying attention.

► Companies that have several allied confederations in a low average % that "face each other", but one of them end up yielding 108 x 0 result placing reserves, always helping the well-ranked confederation of the company.

► Tireless search to find ways to circumvent system being of the game or draws, not to see managers seeking to understand the game and win honestly but rather dishonest ways to be the best.

Opinion exposure is to somehow open the eyes of the nordeus and seek ways to inhibit such falconry, but also make explicit to scammers who can change the way of playing the game and who can achieve their goals without seeking the easiest way that is the dishonest!